David M. Hart, “The Classical Liberal Tradition: Theory and History
(A Two-Part Lecture)”
[Created: 21 June, 2015]
[Updated:
November 16, 2017
]
IHS Advanced Studies Summer Seminar
“Liberty & Scholarship: Challenges and Critiques”
Bryn Mawr College, PA
Sat. 13 - Fri. 19 June 2015
Lectures and Discussion:
Opening Lecture (Sat. 4:15–6:00 pm): “Twelve Keys Concepts
of the Classical Liberal Tradition” (alternate title: “The Classical
Liberal Tradition: Theory and History Part I”)
Second Lecture (Sun. 9:00–10:45 am): “A Survey of the History
of the Classical Liberal Movement” (alternate title: “The Classical
Liberal Tradition: Theory and History Part II”)
Discussion Group (Sun. 4:15–6:00 pm): “On the Spread of Classical
Liberal Ideas: History, Theory, and Strategy”
Third Lecture (Tues. (11:00–12:45 am): “Images of Liberty and
Power: the Subversion of State Propaganda”
Concluding Lecture (Thurs. 11:00–12:45 am): “Competing
Visions of the Future: Socialist and Classical Liberal”
Draft:4 April, 2015
Revised: 9 June 2015
Author: Dr. David M. Hart.
Director of the Online Library of Liberty Project at Liberty Fund <oll.libertyfund.org> and
Academic Editor of the Collected Works of Frédéric Bastiat.
Histories of the Classical Liberal/Libertarian Movement:
History and Theory of Free Market Economics:
One Volume Treatments of CL/L Theory and Policy
What CLs were against
Articles on Key Concepts from the Encyclopedia of Libertarianism
Readings on Key Movements and Events in the History of the CLT
Readings on Key Individuals in the History of the CLT
Key Movements and Events which have hampered the Emergence of Free
Societies
The Classical Liberal Tradition - An Uneasy Relationship between
Liberty and Power
Introduction
There are some inter-related threads I wish to explore on the Classical Liberal
Tradition (CLT):
an examination of the tradition of political and economic thought which
came to be known as “classical liberalism” (in the 19th and early
20th centuries) or “libertarianism” (in the second half of the
20th century);
what these Classical Liberals believed in (my Concept Map of CL and “12
Key Concepts”) and
what they opposed
a brief survey of the history of the Classical Liberal Tradition (CLT)
over the past 400 years (1640–2015), with an emphasis on 4 particular
historical periods:
1640s: the English Civil War/Revolution
1750–1790: the American and French Revolutions
the long liberal 19th century 1815–1914
the post-WW2 liberal renaissance
why was there a greater flourishing of CL then?
emergence of new ideas about liberty?
greater willingness to act on these ideas in order to change society
reaction to increases in State Power or crises in the State (war and
debt)?
these reactions were of two different kind:
“conservative” CL: resisting state imposed changes on traditional
religious, social, political, economic practices
“revolutionary” CL: seeing the possibilities of bringing
freedom to those who have never enjoyed it before, women, slaves, serfs,
women; or moving society into new, radical pro-freedom direction which
has never existed before (free trade, laissez-faire, privatising public
goods)
a discussion of the theory and history of the spread of Classical Liberal
ideas and what this means for developing a better strategy for the future
(Discussion Group)
ideas and interests (Mises)
the production, dissemination and consumption of ideas: the role of
producers, investors, entrepreneurs, salespeople, and consumers of ideas
the nature and speed of ideological change
On Ideas, Interests, and Ideological Change
Some things of general concern regarding “ideas” (to be discussed
in more detail in the Discussion Group):
what role do ideas and interests play in human behaviour/action (Mises’ theory)?
how do people come to hold the ideas they hold?
the links between works of high theory (Theorie), the propagation of those
ideas, the implementation of those ideas (Praxis)
how and why do the ideas people hold change over time?
how can reformers (like CLs) best go about changing the ideas people hold?
For each of the 4 main periods of CL intellectual development and political/economic
influence, we need to thinks about:
the key theoretical text/s
the methods used to spread those ideas to others (tracts, pamphlets, newspapers,
public discussion
the legislation or institutions used to implement these ideas (constitutions,
bills of rights, repeal of legislation, courts and legal practice)
the key individuals who acted as intellectual or political entrepreneurs
to make this happen
Recommended Reading
See my website the Handouts for more details:
David M. Hart, “Study Guides on the Classical Liberal Tradition”
David Hart’s “concept map” of the “Key Ideas of
Classical Liberalism”
The Encyclopedia of Libertarianism, (2008)
The OLL Reader: An Anthology of the Best of the Online Library of Liberty
501 Quotations about Liberty and Power
The Libertarian Reader: Classic and Contemporary Readings from Lao-Tzu
to Milton Friedman, ed. David Boaz (1997)
Some Definitions
Need to define our terms
definition offered in EoL
Dan Klein’s work on when “liberal” came to have its modern
political meaning
“classical” vs. other types of liberalism: New Liberalism;
American liberalism
other names: voluntaryism, individualism, anarcho-capitalism
is Classical Liberalism the same as Libertarianism?
when did people with CL ideas first become self-conscious about having
a different and coherent way of viewing the world?
Definitions:
David Conway, “Classical Liberalism” in The Encyclopedia of
Libertarianism, ed. Ronald Hamowy (Los Angeles: Sage, 2008. A Project
of the Cato Institute), pp. 295–98. Quote, pp. 295–96. Originally
in David Conway, In Defence of the Realm: The Place of Nations in Classical
Liberalism (Aldershot, UK: Ashgate Publishing, 2004).
Liberalism is a political ideology distinguishable from other ideologies
by its assignment of a much greater political importance and value to human
liberty, understood as a condition of being subject to as few constraints
and restraints imposed by others as possible. All liberals agree
that human beings will suffer deliberate constraint and restraint as each
others’ hands if there is no system of law limiting their powers over each
other. Accordingly , liberals regard laws that prohibit these constraints
as being conducive to, rather than destructive of, liberty.
Liberalism only acquired its name in the early 19th century, well over a
century after the ideology began to take shape. Classical liberalism is the
original version of the ideology. It received its qualifying adjective only
in relatively recent times from the felt need to distinguish the original
version from later forms of liberalism that differ from it significantly.
Other definitions:
“The libertarian creed rests upon one central axiom: that no man
or group of men may aggress against the person or property of anyone else.
This may be called the “nonaggression axiom.” “Aggression”
is defined as the initiation of the use or threat of physical violence against
the person or property of anyone else. Aggression is therefore synonymous
with invasion. If no man may aggress against another; if, in short, everyone
has the absolute right to be “free” from aggression …” (Rothbard, For
a New Liberty (1978), p.23.)
“We might define libertarianism as a species of (classical liberalism), an
advocacy of individual liberty, free markets, and limited government rooted
in a commitment to self-ownership, imprescriptible rights, and the moral
autonomy of the individual.” (David Boaz, The Libertarian
Reader (1997), p. xiv.)
“Every man has freedom to do all that he wills, provided he infringes
not the equal freedom of any other man.” (Herbert
Spencer, “the law of equal liberty” in Social Statics (1851).)
My description:
Classical Liberal is someone who advocates individual liberty, free markets,
limited government, free trade, peace
“classical” period 1815–1914 (peak 1840s–1880s)
Liberal Party (Britain) formed 1859
two schools of CL thought
utilitarianism (English)
natural rights (French)
CL arose in opposition to royalism, mercantilism, conservatism, socialism
“New Liberalism” emerged late 19thC, advocated more extensive
govt. intervention on utilitarian grounds (Hobhouse, Green)
(American) Liberalism like British/Australian labourism or European social
democracy
Dan Klein on when “liberal” came to mean liberal:
“But now using Google’s Ngram Viewer we can see what the word “liberal”—as
an adjective—was used to modify. Up to 1769 the word was used only in pre-political
ways, but in and around 1769 such terms as “liberal policy,” “liberal plan,”
“liberal system,” “liberal views,” “liberal ideas,” and “liberal principles”
begin sprouting like flowers.”
Part I - The Early Modern Period (17th and 18th Centuries) (Throne, Altar,
Barracks, Mercantilism/Cronyism, Serfdom)
The CLT first emerged as a reaction to the excessive power of the absolutist
state and church in early modern Europe (16th and 17th centuries). The first
rumblings of dissent appeared in the mid–17th century when religious
and dynastic wars wracked Europe and reached a climax in the Revolutions in
America and France which overthrew the old order and introduced new regimes
based upon liberal principles.
The issues which prompted many people to rethink their traditional relationship
to the state and the church in the 17th and 18th centuries was a result of
numerous factors including:
the growing power of the monarchy as the state grew and centralised its
powers vis-à-vis other traditional power holders such as the landed aristocracy
and the church (“Throne”)
the repression of religious and other forms of dissent following the Reformation
and the scientific revolution (“Altar”)
increasing taxation and debt to fund wars leading to a clash between parliaments
and the crown over the granting of new tax money, especially during the crisis
of the 17thC (the Thirty Years War) (“Barracks”)
mercantilist regulation of trade and the economy in favour of powerful
vested interests including members of the aristocracy and preferred commercial
groups (“Cronyism”)
periodic crises of agricultural production caused by poor harvests and
chronic poor productivity of agriculture (“Serfdom”)
Part II - The 19th Century (Conservatism, Militarism, Protectionism, Imperialism,
Socialism)
Even after the American and French Revolutions changed the face of Europe
and North America CLs had to face other challenges throughout the 19th century
because of the incomplete nature of the revolutions in which they had participated:
the Napoleonic Wars had changed the nature of warfare: ideologically motivated,
mass armies of citizens
the continued existence of slavery in the European colonies
the expansion and strength of slavery in the US before 1861
the restoration of the conservative monarchies after 1815 and the struggle
for constitutional limits on their powers and civil liberties
the strength of economic nationalism (F. List) & protectionism
protectionism in the US
the rise of Nationalism and Wars of Nation Building in Germany and the
US
Civil War, U.S.
German Wars of Unification
the expansion of colonialism and imperialism in Asia and Africa
the rise of socialism, labour parties, Marxism
the return of protectionism
the arms race prior to WW1
Part III - The 20th Century to the Present (Socialism, Bolshevism/Communism,
Fascism, Keynesianism, Welfare/Warfare/Surveillance State)
The WW1 was a disaster for CL and saw the collapse of many liberal institutions
which had been created in the 19thC and the near abandonment of CL ideas among
people. The Thirty Years War of the 20thC was the nadir of the CL movement
until its slow revival in post-WW2 period and creation of modern libertarian
movement in the US in the 1970s.
the general phenomenon of 20th Century Statism
World War 1 - War Socialism
post-war hyperinflations and the Great Depression
the rise of Bolshevism and Fascism
Keynesian & the Welfare State
World War 2
Total War
Military-Industrial Complex
post-war welfare state, regulatory state, welfare/warfare state in the
US
Sidebar: The Classical Liberal Theory of the State
All of the above are activities of the state in various versions.
Need to ask, what is the CL theory of the State? what should the Sate do and
how big should it be?
Hotly contested issue in the CL tradition. Different liberal theories about
the proper functions of the state:
the “classical” classical liberal state (Smith, Mill, Hayek):
police, national defence, public goods, education (?)
the “minarchist state” (Mises, Rand, Nozick): police, national
defence, limited public goods
the “ultra-minarchist state” (Say, Bastiat, Molinari II): police,
national defence, but with considerable private or local provision
the fully “voluntarist state” (Spencer, Molinari I, Rothbard):
all state activities deregulated, privatised, or abolished
Overhead of “Spectrum of State Power” and “Functions of the Classical Liberal
State”:
What Classical Liberals were FOR (the sum of freedoms that make
up Liberty)
Pro-Liberty Intellectual and Political Movements were a Reaction to and Opposition
against the Abuse of Power
The following is a list of some significant movements and events during which
CLs developed their ideas about liberty and which were fundamental in creating
free societies. There are four key periods of activity (or “clusters”)
when CL ideas were especially prominent and influential, namely the 1640s,
the last half of the 18th century, the period of “classical liberalism” during
the 19thC, and the post-WW2 renaissance of CL thought and activity.
In summary they are:
The Pre-History of Classical Liberalism: Precursors and Influences
The Birth of Classical Liberalism - 17th and 18th C
Classical Liberalism Proper - 19thC
The Modern Classical Liberal and Libertarian Movement (post WW2)
(1) The Pre-History of Classical Liberalism: Precursors and Influences
The Ancient World
Stoicism and Epicurianism; Cicero
Natural Law; Roman property law
Medieval Period
Magna Carta
the Free Cities and their Charters
Scholastics - School of Salamanca
Reformation & Renaissance
Classical Republicanism
The Dutch Republic
(2) The Birth of Classical Liberalism
The 17th Century
English Common Law: Edward Coke
The English Civil Wars/Revolution of the 1640s: the Levellers, John
Lilburne, Richard Overton, William Walwyn, John Milton
the Glorious Revolution of 1688: Algernon Sidney, John Locke, Whigs
The 18thC Enlightenment in Europe and North America
18thC Commonwealthmen, Cato’s Letters, Trenchard and Gordon
The Scottish Enlightenment: Adam Smith, Adam Ferguson, David Hume
The French Enlightenment: Physiocracy, Montesquieu, Voltaire, Diderot
- Economic Thought: Adam Smith, the Physiocrat, Turgot
the 18th Century Revolutions
The American Revolution: Thomas Paine, Thomas Jefferson, James Madison
The French Revolution: Lafayette, Condorcet, the Girondins, Destutt
de Tracy, Madame de Stael
(3) Classical Liberalism Proper
19th century Classical Liberalism
Classical Liberalism (the English School): Philosophic Radicals, Utilitarianism,
Jeremy Bentham, James Mill, Classical Economics, John Stuart Mill
Classical Liberalism (the French School): Jean-Baptiste Say, Benjamin
Constant, Charles Comte, Charles Dunoyer, Frédéric Bastiat, Gustave de
Molinari
key issues and movements:
the Abolition of Slave Trade and Slavery: Clarkson, William Wilberforce,
William Lloyd Garrison, Frederick Douglass, John Brown, Lysander Spooner
Constitutional Monarchism: Benjamin Constant
Free Trade Movement: Anti-Corn Law League, Richard Cobden, John Bright;
Bastiat, Michel Chevalier
1848 Revolutions: constitutionalism and abolition of serfdom
opposition to war and empire: Cobden, Bright, W.G. Sumner
Feminism and Women’s Rights: Mary Wollstonecraft, J.S. Mill
The Radical Individualists: Thomas Hodgskin, Herbert Spencer, Auberon
Herbert
The Austrian School of Economics (1st generation): Carl Menger, Eugen von
Böhm-Bawerk
(4) The Modern Classical Liberal and Libertarian Movement
The Austrian School (inter-war years): Ludwig von Mises, Friedrich Hayek
Post-World War 2 Renaissance
Mont Pelerin Society: Milton Friedman, Karl Popper
Institute for Economic Affairs (IEA): Anthony Fisher, Arthur Seldon
Foundation for Economic Education (FEE): Leonard Read
Institute for Humane Studies: F.A. Harper
Liberty Fund: Pierre Goodrich
The Austrian School of Economics (2nd generation): Mises, Hayek, Murray
N. Rothbard, Israel Kirzner
Other Schools and Movements
Chicago School of Economics: Milton Friedman
Public Choice Economics: James Buchanan & Gordon Tullock
Objectivism: Ayn Rand
modern American Libertarian movement
Murray Rothbard
Cato Institute: Ed Crane
Libertarian Party
other events of note:
liberation of the Chinese peasants/serfs
modern Western liberal democracies
liberalisation of laws against women, gays, civil rights
post-war prosperity
liberalised international trade
In a nutshell I would say the CL movement and CL ideas evolved in the following
manner:
CL first emerged as a reaction to the excessive power of the absolutist
state and church in early modern Europe (16th and 17th centuries).
Through a series of rebellions and revolutions this power was challenged
based upon new ideas about individual liberty which slowly evolved into more
coherent and sophisticated theories of how societies, markets, and political
institutions worked. CLs had significant political victories, but they were
partial ones.
The period from about 1750 to 1850 was crucial in the development of CL
ideas as a result of the Enlightenment in Europe and America, the development
of economic theory by the Physiocrats and Adam Smith, and the emergence of
political theories of limited constitutional government during the American
and French revolutions and their immediate aftermath.
The heyday of CL was much of the 19th century before CL ideas and institutions
were smashed by the events of WW1; let’s say approximately 1830–1914.
It was during this period that liberal, democratic, and constitutional societies
emerged in Western Europe, North America, and some of the colonies of the
British Empire (like Australia).
Unfortunately this experiment in liberty was all too brief before rampant
statism, militarism, fascism, bolshevism, and welfare-statism seriously undermined
it.
We are now living in a contradictory moment in history when we have never
been as prosperous, educated, healthy, and “free” (in some important
areas such as discrimination against people of colour, women, and homosexuals)
yet at the same time the burden of the state in terms of taxation levels,
inflation, debt, regulation, and surveillance and regulation of our personal
lives have never been greater.
So I would conclude that the great CL experiment has only partly been achieved
and that there remains a great deal to be done before the promise of a fully
free society can become a reality.
The Two Different Faces of CL - Conservative and Revolutionary
There are two different “faces” or “aspects” to CL
which this history reveals to us:
A “conservative” CL: where individuals resist state imposed changes
on their traditional religious, social, political practices:
state/church wants to ban/repress unorthodox religious practices/ideas
state introduces new taxes to pay for war
good example is North American colonists in mid–18thC after enjoying “salutary
neglect” from Imperial England reacting to new or properly enforced
taxation to pay for French-Indian Wars
A “revolutionary” CL: where individuals see the possibilities
of going further in new directions of liberty:
bringing freedom to those who have never enjoyed it before, slaves, serfs,
women, gays;
or moving society towards a new, radical pro-freedom direction which has
never existed before (complete free trade, laissez-faire, the complete voluntary
or private provision of public goods)
The Key Ideas of Classical Liberalism: Foundations, Process, Liberties
This idea map is designed to give you an overview of what I think are the
essential features of the classical liberal tradition as it has evolved over
the past 400 years.
The Foundations of CL Ideas
The foundations for these beliefs are based upon the following:
the basic principles
life
liberty
property
the philosophical grounds for belief
natural law (God’s Law) and natural rights
utility
The Processes for Achieving and Sustaining a Free Society
The processes by which these principles are carried out/put into practice;
how people interact with each other
the non-aggression principle
voluntary cooperation
toleration
free movement of people, goods, & ideas
individual flourishing
peaceful coexistence with others
arbitration of disputes
spontaneous orders
Liberty as “the sum of all freedoms”
Liberty should be seen as a “bundle” or “cluster” of
freedoms which together make up what is “Liberty” (FB quote).
And what is liberty, this word that has the power of making
all hearts beat faster and causing agitation around the world, if it is not the
sum of all freedoms: freedom of conscience, teaching, and association;
freedom of the press; freedom to travel, work, and trade; in other words,
the free exercise of all inoffensive faculties by all men and, in still other
terms, the destruction of all despotic regimes, even legal despotism, and
the reduction of the law to its sole rational attribution, which is to regulate
the individual law of legitimate defense or to punish injustice.
LIBERTY is compromised of three main bundles of freedoms:
political/legal freedoms
limited (no) government
the rule of law
freedom speech and association (religion)
right of exit/entry (movement or new govt)
economic freedoms:
domestic free markets
international free trade
laissez-faire
progress
social freedoms
equality under the law
toleration of different ideas and behaviour
acts between consenting adults
A Summary of what CLs were FOR: Twelve Key Concepts of Liberty
I have picked out 12 Concepts from the above mind map which I think are most
important to understanding what CL was and is.
Natural Law and Natural Rights
Private Property
Individual Liberty
Idea of Spontaneous Order
Free Markets
Limited Government
Rule of Law
Freedom of Speech & Religion
Free Trade
Peace
Progress
Right of Exit
Above is a list of 12 key concepts of liberty which have been developed over
several hundred years by many authors in the classical liberal, free market
and conservative traditions. There is probably no single thinker who would
agree with every aspect of these key concepts. Rather, they are an amalgam
or “ideal type” taken from the various streams of thinking about
individual liberty which have emerged in Western Europe and North America since
the early modern period. It is designed to summarize in a more manageable way
a complex way of thinking about the nature of individual liberty.
Sidebar question: When did Liberals become aware that they
had a unique, different, and coherent view of the world?
Who wrote the first one volume survey of the CL position?
Sidebar question: When did theorists become self-conscious that they were
advocating a unique, consistent and all-encompassing liberal worldview (Weltanschauung)
which could be articulated in one volume; that their ideas were interconnected,
were based upon a well thought out set of fundamental principles, and resulted
in a comprehensive set of proposals for liberal reform?
Wilhelm von Humboldt, Ideen zu einem Versuch, die Gränzen der Wirksamkeit
des Staates zu bestimmen (The Limits of State Action) (1792, 1851)
Benjamin Constant, Principes de politique, applicables à tous les gouvernemens
représentatifs (The Principles of Politics) (1815)
Gustave de Molinari, Les Soirées de la rue Saint-Lazare (Conversations
on Saint Lazarus Street) (1849)
Herbert Spencer, Social Statics (1851)
J.S. Mill, On Liberty (1859)
Herbert Spencer, The Principles of Ethics (1879)
Bruce Smith, Liberty and Liberalism (1888)
Ludwig von Mises, Liberalismus (Liberalism) (1927)
Friedrich Hayek, The Constitution of Liberty (1960)
Milton Friedman, Capitalism and Freedom (1962)
Murray Rothbard, For a New Liberty (1974)
Twelve Key Concepts of Liberty
A more detailed examination of the “12 Key Concepts of Liberty”
Natural Law and Natural Rights
Private Property
Individual Liberty
Idea of Spontaneous Order
Free Markets
Limited Government
Rule of Law
Freedom of Speech & Religion
Free Trade
Peace
Progress
Right of Exit
See the collection of 501 Quotations about Liberty and Power at the
OLL organised by topic:
501 Quotations about Liberty and Power: The Collected Quotations from
the Online Library of Liberty (2004–2014) (Indianapolis: Liberty
Fund, 2015). http://oll.libertyfund.org/titles/2648.
Part X: The Critique of Socialism and Interventionism
Part XI: Visions of the Future
(1.) Natural Law and Natural Rights
Key ideas:
the world is governed by natural laws which are discoverable by human reason
Tom Paine’s “imprescriptible rights”: the right to life,
liberty, property, and the pursuit of happiness
rights are not created by government but exist anterior to it
[alternative view of utilitarianism - maximization of happiness or utility]
EoL articles:
“Natural Law” & “Natural Rights”
“Theories of Rights”
“Utilitarianism”
OLL Quotations from Key Texts:
Richard Overton shoots An Arrow against all Tyrants from the prison of
Newgate into the prerogative bowels of the arbitrary House of Lords and all
other usurpers and tyrants whatsoever (1646) http://oll.libertyfund.org/quotes/219
property rights are not created by government but exist anterior to it
(i.e. they are “natural rights” not “artificial rights” (Hodgskin)
the right of self-propriety or self-ownership (the Levellers & Locke)
the right to create or acquire property titles in unowned resources (Locke)
the right to exchange property titles with others (private contracts)
the right to enjoy one’s property so long as no aggression is initiated
against others (non-aggression axiom)
property rights (in one’s person, home, possessions) create an individual,
private sphere which must be protected from outside interference (by state,
church, other individuals) (Humboldt & Mill)
EoL articles:
“Private Property”
“Nonaggression Axiom”
OLL Quotations from Key Texts:
Gaius states that according to natural reason the first occupier of any
previously unowned property becomes the just owner (2nd Century) http://oll.libertyfund.org/quotes/271
Captain John Clarke asserts the right of all men to vote in the formation
of a new constitution by right of the property they have in themselves (1647) http://oll.libertyfund.org/quotes/212
Sir William Blackstone argues that occupancy of previously unowned land
creates a natural right to that property which excludes others from it (1753) http://oll.libertyfund.org/quotes/216
J.B. Say on the self-evident nature of property rights which is nevertheless
violated by the state in taxation and slavery (1817) http://oll.libertyfund.org/quotes/152
Thomas Hodgskin argues for a Lockean notion of the right to property (“natural”)
and against the Benthamite notion that property rights are created by the
state (“artificial”) (1832) http://oll.libertyfund.org/quotes/147
Wolowski and Levasseur argue that Property is “the fruit of human liberty”
and that Violence and Conquest have done much to disturb this natural order
(1884) http://oll.libertyfund.org/quotes/30
Lysander Spooner spells out his theory of “mine and thine”, or the science
of natural law and justice, which alone can ensure that mankind lives in
peace (1882) http://oll.libertyfund.org/quotes/182
(3.) Individual Liberty
Key ideas:
the dignity of the individual, individual autonomy, sanctity of life
an individual, private sphere which is protected from outside interference
right of voluntary association among individuals
civil society results from voluntary association between individuals with
common interests
the Law of Equal Freedom (Spencer)
EoL articles:
“Civil Society”
“Individual Rights” & “Equality” (of rights)
“Freedom” & “Political and Ethical Individualism”
“Presumption of Liberty”
OLL Quotations from Key Texts:
Wilhelm von Humboldt argued that freedom was the “Grand and Indispensable
Condition” for individual flourishing (1792) http://oll.libertyfund.org/quotes/62
In Percy Shelley’s poem Liberty liberty is compared to a force of nature
sweeping the globe, where “tyrants and slaves are like shadows of night”
which will disappear in “the van of the morning light” (1824) http://oll.libertyfund.org/quotes/101
Harriet Taylor wants to see “freedom and admissibility” in all areas of
human activity replace the system of “privilege and exclusion” (1847) http://oll.libertyfund.org/quotes/225
J.S. Mill’s great principle was that “over himself, over his own body and
mind, the individual is sovereign” (1859) http://oll.libertyfund.org/quotes/81
J.S. Mill spoke in Parliament in favour of granting women the right to
vote, to have “a voice in determining who shall be their rulers” (1866) http://oll.libertyfund.org/quotes/91
Lord Acton writes to Bishop Creighton that the same moral standards should
be applied to all men, political and religious leaders included, especially
since “Power tends to corrupt and absolute power corrupts absolutely” (1887) http://oll.libertyfund.org/quotes/214
(4.) Idea of Spontaneous Order
Key ideas:
institutions emerge spontaneously and evolve over time
by pursuing their own selfish interests in a voluntary manner they are
led as if by an “invisible hand” (Adam Smith) to promote the
welfare of others
Adam Ferguson observed that social structures of all kinds were not “the
result of human action, but not the execution of any human design” (1782) http://oll.libertyfund.org/quotes/104
Bernard Mandeville uses a fable about bees to show how prosperity and good
order comes about through spontaneous order (1705) http://oll.libertyfund.org/quotes/66
domestic free markets and international free trade (A. Smith, F. Bastiat,
L. von Mises)
voluntary exchanges are mutually beneficial (ex ante)
division of labour
freely set market prices (information about supply & demand - Hayek)
private ownership of economic assets
private contracts for exchange of property
legal protection of property rights
decentralized decision-making - “I, Pencil” - Hayek’s “problem of knowledge”
no regulation outside of legal protection of property rights (tort law
for fraud, damages)
complete freedom of movement of people (labour), capital, and goods (laissez-faire,
laissez-passer)
minimal/no taxes, balanced government budgets
no subsidies or protection for favoured individuals or groups
the incentive of profit and the disincentive of losses
EoL articles:
“Capitalism”
“Laissez-Faire Policy” & “Competition”
“Division of Labor”
“Entrepreneurship” & “Free-Market Economy”
OLL Quotations from Key Texts:
Adam Smith on the greater productivity brought about by the division of
labor and technological innovation (1760s) http://oll.libertyfund.org/quotes/316
Adam Smith argued that the “propensity to truck, barter, and exchange”
was inherent in human nature and gave rise to things such as the division
of labour (1776) http://oll.libertyfund.org/quotes/48
Nassau Senior objected to any government regulation of factories which
meant that a horde of inspectors would interfere with the organization of
production (1837) http://oll.libertyfund.org/quotes/169
Ludwig von Mises argues that monopolies are the direct result of government
intervention and not the product of any inherent tendency within the capitalist
system (1949) http://oll.libertyfund.org/quotes/138
Ludwig von Mises argues that the division of labor and human cooperation
are the two sides of the same coin and are not antagonistic to each other
(1949) http://oll.libertyfund.org/quotes/129
Kirzner defines economics as the reconciliation of conflicting ends given
the existence of inescapable scarcity (1960) http://oll.libertyfund.org/quotes/283
(6.) Limited Government
Key ideas:
governments rule with the consent of the governed (Locke)
strictly defined powers limited by constitution or bill of rights (Jefferson,
Madison)
right to choose one’s rulers/representatives (elections); elections to
periodically remove bad governments (Philosophic Radicals - Mill)
checks & balances to limit power of branches of government (Montesquieu,
US Constitution)
decentralization of power (federalism, states rights, municipal govt.)
the problem of defining the limits of govt. power (classical Smithian view,
nightwatchman state (JB Say, Bastiat), anarcho-capitalism (Molinari, Spencer,
Rothbard)
the problem of keeping government limited (Public Choce, "who guards
the guardians?)
Overhead of “Spectrum of State Power” and “Functions of
the Classical Liberal State”
EoL articles:
“Constitutionalism” & “Limited Government”
“Bill of Rights, U.S.” & “Federalism”
“Minimal State” & “State”
“Anarchism” & “Anarcho-Capitalism”
OLL Quotations from Key Texts:
Edmund Burke asks a key question of political theory: “quis custodiet
ipsos custodes?” (how is one to be defended against the very guardians
who have been appointed to guard us?) (1756) http://oll.libertyfund.org/quotes/44
Frédéric Bastiat on the state as the great fiction by which everyone seeks
to live at the expense of everyone else (1848) http://oll.libertyfund.org/quotes/196
John Stuart Mill on the need for limited government and political rights
to prevent the “king of the vultures” and his “minor harpies” in the government
from preying on the people (1859) http://oll.libertyfund.org/quotes/201
The Australian radical liberal Bruce Smith lays down some very strict rules
which should govern the actions of any legislator (1887) http://oll.libertyfund.org/quotes/65
(7.) Rule of Law
Key ideas:
rule of laws not of men
law applies equally to all (including agents of the state)
common law
independent courts
common law, trial by jury, right to habeas corpus
abolition of “cruel & unusual punishment” (torture, death penalty)
EoL articles:
“Coercion” & “Constitutionalism”
“Common Law” & “Law Merchant”
OLL Quotations from Key Texts:
Sir Edward Coke defends British Liberties and the Idea of Habeas Corpus
in the Petition of Right before Parliament (1628) http://oll.libertyfund.org/quotes/16
Sir William Blackstone provides a strong defence of personal liberty and
concludes that to “secretly hurry” a man to prison is a “dangerous engine
of arbitrary government” (1753) http://oll.libertyfund.org/quotes/203
The IVth Amendment to the American Constitution states that the people
shall be secure in their persons against unreasonable searches and seizures
and that no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause (1788) http://oll.libertyfund.org/quotes/134
J.S. Mill in a speech before parliament denounced the suspension of Habeas
Corpus and the use of flogging in Ireland, saying that those who ordered
this “deserved flogging as much as any of those who were flogged by his orders”
(1866) http://oll.libertyfund.org/quotes/87
the right of assembly and right to engage in peaceful protest
no state-enforced religion
right to practice the religion of one’s choice
liberty of political belief and practice (18th & 19thC, JS Mill)
toleration of all unorthodox thought and (non injurious) behaviour
EoL articles:
“Conscience” (liberty of)
“Cosmopolitanism”
“Freedom of Speech” & “Freedom of Thought”
“Religion and Liberty” & “Separation of Church and
State”
OLL Quotations from Key Texts:
John Milton opposed censorship for many reasons but one thought sticks
in the mind, that “he who destroys a good book, kills reason itself” (1644) http://oll.libertyfund.org/quotes/97
John Locke believed that the magistrate should not punish sin but only
violations of natural rights and public peace (1689) http://oll.libertyfund.org/quotes/181
Pierre Bayle begins his defence of religious toleration with this appeal
that the light of nature, or Reason, should be used to settle religious differences
and not coercion (1708) http://oll.libertyfund.org/quotes/93
David Hume argues that “love of liberty” in some individuals often attracts
the religious inquisitor to persecute them and thereby drive society into
a state of “ignorance, corruption, and bondage” (1757) http://oll.libertyfund.org/quotes/223
Voltaire notes that where Commerce and Toleration predominate, a Multiplicity
of Faiths can live together in Peace and Happiness (1764) http://oll.libertyfund.org/quotes/26
complete freedom of movement of people and goods (laissez-faire, laissez-passer)
domestic free markets and international free trade (A. Smith, F. Bastiat,
L. von Mises)
natural harmony of interests leads to peace
benefits of division of labour, comparative advantage (David Ricardo) exist
between households, cities, regions, and “nation states”
no subsidies or protection for favoured individuals or groups
policy of unilateral free trade is beneficial to consumers
EoL articles:
“Free Trade”
“Natural Harmony of Interests”
OLL Quotations from Key Texts:
John Ramsay McCulloch argues that smuggling is “wholly the result of vicious
commercial and financial legislation” and that it could be ended immediately
by abolishing this legislation (1899) http://oll.libertyfund.org/quotes/204
Harriet Martineau condemns tariffs as a “vicious aristocratic principle”
designed to harm the ordinary working man and woman (1861) http://oll.libertyfund.org/quotes/137
Madison argued that war is the major way by which the executive office
increases its power, patronage, and taxing power (1793) http://oll.libertyfund.org/quotes/236
James Mill likens the expence and economic stagnation brought about by
war to a “pestilential wind” which ravages the country (1808) http://oll.libertyfund.org/quotes/323
Cobden urges the British Parliament not to be the “Don Quixotes of Europe”
using military force to right the wrongs of the world (1854) http://oll.libertyfund.org/quotes/322
William Graham Sumner denounced America’s war against Spain and thought
that “war, debt, taxation, diplomacy, a grand governmental system, pomp,
glory, a big army and navy, lavish expenditures, political jobbery” would
result in imperialism (1898) http://oll.libertyfund.org/quotes/56
Ludwig von Mises laments the passing of the Age of Limited Warfare and
the coming of Mass Destruction in the Age of Statism and Conquest (1949) http://oll.libertyfund.org/quotes/27
(11.) Progress
Key ideas:
through hard work and initiative both individuals and society can be improved
indefinitely
wealth creation is a product of the free market and trade
savings create pool of wealth to benefit current & next generation
goal of individual flourishing (Humboldt)
EoL articles:
“Economic Development”
“Material Progress”
“Progress”
OLL Quotations from Key Texts:
Voltaire on the Benefits which Trade and Economic Abundance bring to People
living in the Present Age (1736) http://oll.libertyfund.org/quotes/20
Condorcet writes about the inevitability of the spread of liberty and prosperity
while he was in prison awaiting execution by the Jacobins (1796) http://oll.libertyfund.org/quotes/106
Lord Macaulay writes a devastating review of Southey’s Colloquies in which
the Poet Laureate’s ignorance of the real condition of the working class
in England is exposed (1830) http://oll.libertyfund.org/quotes/149
(12.) Right of Free Movement (Exit/Entry)
Key ideas:
internal (personal & geographical) - right to free movement within
the state (no slavery, being tied to the land (serfs), internal passports & controls)
external (personal & geographical) - right to emigrate/immigrate, right
to cross political borders
internal (govt, leave its “jurisdiction”)
right to change one’s government (“throw the bastards out” in free
elections, problem of “serial bastardry”)
right of rebellion against unjust state, resistance to tyranny
Jefferson feared that it would only be a matter of time before the American
system of government degenerated into a form of “elective despotism” (1785) http://oll.libertyfund.org/quotes/237
Herbert Spencer concludes from his principle of equal freedom that individuals
have the Right to Ignore the State (1851) http://oll.libertyfund.org/quotes/154
Quotations about Liberty and Powerhttp://oll.libertyfund.org/quotes :
a selection of over 500 quotations from the most important texts in the OLL
collection arranged by topic.
The Concise Encyclopedia of Economics, ed. David R. Henderson
(Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, 2008). Also available online at Econlib http://www.econlib.org/library/CEE.html.
Murray N. Rothbard, An Austrian Perspective on the History of Economic
Thought: Vol. I Economic Thought before Adam Smith (Auburn, Alabama:
Ludwig von Mises Institute, 2006).
Murray N. Rothbard, An Austrian Perspective on the History of Economic
Thought: Vol. II Classical Economics (Auburn, Alabama: Ludwig von
Mises Institute, 2006).
One Volume Treatments of CL/L Theory and Policy
(Classic and Modern, in chronological order).
This is a list of one volume surveys of the classical liberal position which
have appeared over the past two centuries. The defining characteristic is that
they are an attempt to provide the reader with a survey of the basic political
and economic principles behind the classical liberal tradition as well as some
concrete proposals for reform in order to bring about a freer society. With
the exception of Wilhelm von Humboldt’s The Limits of State Action which
was written in 1792 but was not published in full until 1854, it seems that
it was not until the mid–19th century before people began thinking of
classical liberalism as a coherent body of thought which could be encapsulated
in a one volume treatment.
Wilhelm von Humboldt, The Sphere and Duties of Government (The
Limits of State Action) (1792, 1854) </titles/589>
Constant (1818??)
Gustave de Molinari, Les Soirées de la rue Saint-Lazare (Conversations
on Saint Lazarus Street) (1849)
Herbert Spencer, Social Statics (1851) </titles/273>
Herbert Spencer, Social Statics: or, The Conditions essential to
Happiness specified, and the First of them Developed (London:
John Chapman, 1851). http://oll.libertyfund.org/title/273.
JS Mill, On Liberty (1859) </titles/347>
John Stuart Mill, On Liberty (1859) in The Collected Works
of John Stuart Mill, Volume XVIII - Essays on Politics and Society
Part I, ed. John M. Robson, Introduction by Alexander Brady (Toronto:
University of Toronto Press, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1977).http://oll.libertyfund.org/title/233/16550.
Herbert Spencer, The Principles of Ethics (1879) </titles/1882>
Herbert Spencer, The Principles of Ethics, introduction by
Tibor R. Machan (Indianapolis: LibertyClassics, 1978). 2 vols. http://oll.libertyfund.org/title/1882.
Ludwig von Mises, Liberalismus (Jena: Fischer Verlag, 1927).
Ludwig von Mises, Liberalism: The Classical Tradition, trans.
Ralph Raico, ed. Bettina Bien Greaves (Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, 2005). http://oll.libertyfund.org/title/1463.
Bruce Smith, Liberty and Liberalism (1888) </titles/296>
Friedrich Hayek, The Constitution of Liberty (1960)
Friedrich A. Hayek, The Constitution of Liberty (Chicago:
Henry Regnery, 1960).
Milton Friedman, Capitalism and Freedom (1962).
Murray N. Rothbard, For a New Liberty (New York: Macmillan, 1973).
Revised edition 1978.
David Friedman, Machinery of Freedom (1973)
What CLs were against
The relevant articles in the EoL which give a good idea of what CLs were AGAINST
include the following:
“State”
“Taxation”
“War”
“Mercantilism”
Slavery - “World Slavery”
There are some surprising gaps in the coverage provided by the EoL which is
might be expected given the complexity of the ideas and historical events spanning
several centuries. It is already over 600 pages. Here are some topics which
are missing from the EoL:
the Old Order (ancien régime)
Absolutism
Aristocracy
The Church
Religious persecution
Censorship
Class privilege
Serfdom (the abolition of serfdom in Europe between the late 18th and mid
19th centuries was one of the great examples of liberation of oppressed people
in human history)
Articles on Key Concepts from the Encyclopedia of Libertarianism
Articles from The Encyclopedia of Libertarianism (EoL) which are
most pertinent to my list of key concepts include the following. The items
in bold are particularly important in my view.
One should begin with Steve Davies’ “General Introduction,” EoL,
pp. xxv-xxxvii, which is an excellent survey of the ideas, movements, and key
events in the development of liberty, then read as many of the following articles
as you can:
Natural Law and Natural Rights
“Natural Law” & “Natural Rights”
“Theories of Rights”
“Utilitarianism”
Private Property
“Private Property”
“Nonaggression Axiom”
Individual Liberty
“Civil Society”
“Individual Rights” & “Equality” (of rights)
“Freedom” & “Political and Ethical Individualism”
“Presumption of Liberty”
Idea of Spontaneous Order
“Spontaneous Order”
Free Markets
“Capitalism”
“Laissez-Faire Policy” & “Competition”
“Division of Labor”
“Entrepreneurship” & “Free-Market Economy”
Limited Government
“Constitutionalism” & “Limited Government”
“Bill of Rights, U.S.” & “Federalism”
“Minimal State” & “State”
“Anarchism” & “Anarcho-Capitalism”
Rule of Law - “Rule of Law”
“Coercion” & “Constitutionalism”
“Common Law” & “Law Merchant”
Freedom of Speech & Religion, Toleration
“Conscience” (liberty of)
“Cosmopolitanism”
“Religion and Liberty” & “Separation of Church
and State”
Free Trade
“Free Trade”
“Natural Harmony of Interests”
Peace
“Peace and Pacifism”
Progress
“Economic Development”
“Material Progress”
“Progress”
Right of “Exit/Entry”
“Right of Revolution” & “Secessionism”
Freedom of Movement - Emigration & “Immigration”
Readings on Key Movements and Events in the History of the CLT
One should begin with Steve Davies’ “General Introduction,” EoL,
pp. xxv-xxxvii, which is an excellent survey of the ideas, movements, and key
events in the development of liberty, then read some of the articles on specific
historical periods, movements, schools of thought, and individuals. Items in
quotes are entries in the EoL.
(1) The Pre-History of Classical Liberalism
The Ancient World
“Liberty in the Ancient World”
“Epicurianism”, “Stoicism”
“Cicero”
Medieval Period
“Magna Carta”
“Scholastics - School of Salamanca”
Reformation & Renaissance
“Classical Republicanism”
“Dutch Republic”
(2) The Birth of Classical Liberalism
The 17th Century
English “Common Law”: “Edward Coke”
“English Civil Wars”; “The Levellers”; “John
Milton” & “Puritanism”