The "liberal" Course textbook: Theodore Hamerow, The Birth of a New Europe (1983) | The "Marxist" course textbook: Eric Hobsbawm, The Age of Revolution, 1789-1848 (1962) |
This is part of a collection of material on the history of the classical liberal tradition.
Note: There are also links to the lecture notes I used when giving this course.
The subject will deal with the remarkable transformation of European society which took place between the outbreak of the French Revolution in 1789 to the beginning of the First World War in 1914. The guiding principle of the subject is the idea of "opposing voices and contested meanings" - in other words, that the changes taking place in 19th century European society were supported by some groups and indivudals and opposed by others (the "opposing voices"), and that historians have been deeply divided in their interpretation of the meaning and significance of these changes (the "contested meanings").
The approach I will take in the lectures is a thematic one. I will discuss a number of themes dealing with the Economy and Society; Class, Power & Revolution; Political Thought; State, Empire and War; Liberty; and Ideas and Culture, in a chronological, comparative and analytical fashion. In the tutorials we will discuss some of the "opposing voices and contested meanings" including:
In addition, there will be a number of Workshop Lectures, Workshop Seminars and Film and History Seminars in which we will develop the skills required for the study of history in particular and of the humanities in general. These include the use of film by historians, the importance of history as a discipline, and essay and research skills. A number of films will be shown with the aim of exploring the accuracy of the history depicted on the screen.
The aim of this history subject (and of an arts education in general - in my opinion) is to achieve a number of vocational and general educational ends. These include
We plan to pursue these ends in a variety of ways. Some are achieved explicitly, e.g. the Essays and Exercises are designed to develop writing and analytical skills, and some are achieved implicitly, e.g. in general discussion and in the basic assumptions made about the subject.
In keeping with the thematic and comparative approach of the subject, I have chosen two authors - Theodore Hamerow (a conservative liberal) and Eric Hobsbawm (a Marxist) - with very different interpretations of 19thC European history as subject textbooks. Purchase of either the Hamerow book or one of the Hobsbawm books is strongly recommended. Having one of each would be better.
Note: The 4th volume in Hobsbawm's history of Europe is:
For the Workshop Tutorial on "Writing Better Essays" the following work is recommended:
Those who want a chronological treatment of the subject could try the American textbook by Chambers, the video series by Eugen Weber, and the collection of primary source material by Sherman:
The textbook for Part 2 of the subject "Europe in a Changing World, 1890-1956" is
The extraordinary, long and compendious work by Norman Davies, Europe: A History (London: Pimlico, 1997).
Macmillan is publishing a series of works under the general title of "Themes in Comparative History" ed. Clive Emsley. Titles which are relevant to themes covered in this subject include:
One of the most difficult problems confronting students of history is how to make sense of what they read, especially if the historians they read disagree among themselves. To help you come to terms with this problem the lectures and Seminars will give you some practice in handling what I call "opposing voices and contested meanings". Wherever possible, we will examine different points of view - some expressed by contemporaries or eyewitnesses to the events in question (the "opposing voices"), others expressed by historians writing much later in an attempt to make sense of what happened in the past (the "contested meanings"). The Textbooks have been selected to bring out as clearly as possible this "contest" over the meaning of the past. Hamerow is a liberal conservative and Hobsbawm is a Marxist and their different interpretations of 19th century European history should provide a basis for our own discussion.
In all your written work you will be expected to use and discuss the textbooks (Hamerow and Hobsbawm), any relevant primary sources (extracts from printed collections, the film/s, contemporary art or photographs), and other secondary sources (monographs (whole books devoted to the subject), essays in books, and journal articles) - many of which are listed in the Reading Guide.
In many Seminars we will examine closely one or more primary sources or documents from the Reader of Primary Sources. In some cases they will have starkly different stories to tell - some will strenuously oppose the event or change taking place, others will support it just as strenuously, yet others will be confused. What sense can historians make of these "opposing voices" from the past? Before analysing the document itself you will have to do some background reading of the Textbooks or the secondary sources listed in the Reading Guide. Having done this background reading you then need to analyse the document. In many cases you will have to "read between the lines" as much important information will not be stated explicitly but can be extracted only by examining the document's historical context and the biases, preconceptions, and expectations of the author. Some of the Primary Sources will be printed documents (published books or pamphlets, parliamentary reports or debates). Other Primary Sources will be images (such as works of art, etchings, photographs).
Not only do the primary sources give different perspectives on what happened in the past but also historians differ greatly in what they say happened and what these events mean to the modern reader. This is the general problem of the "contested meaning" of history. In all the Seminars we will discuss how the reader can make sense of the vastly different intrerpretations of history offered by conservatives, classical liberals, Marxists, nationalists, feminists, and others. The two textbooks for the subject - one written by a Marxist (Hobsbawm) and the other written by a liberal (Hamerow) - should provide the starting point for our discussion. Other secondary sources listed in the Reading Guide should show this problem even more clearly, especially in formal historiographical disputes among historians over the interpretation and meaning of a number of historical events or problems. Students will be asked to "take sides" in the dispute by arguing for one of the interpretations of the events in question.
We will explore how film can be used by historians both as an historical source which provides information about the past and as a way of interpreting the past. You are required to attend one of the Film Sessions and to write one of your Exercises on that film. The task is to examine one or more primary sources in order to assess the historical accuracy of the film. To do this you will have to do some reading on the persons or events depicted on the screen in order to get some historical background. You then need to see the film (more than once if at all possible) and historically and critically evaluate what you have seen. You should also find out as much as you can about the filmmakers (director, screenwriter, historical advisor, etc), their reasons for making the film as they did, the historical context in which the film was made, and the reception of the film when it was released.
When dealing with primary sources (documents) in many cases you will have to "read between the lines" as much important information will not be stated explicitly but can be extracted only by examining the document's historical context and the biases, preconceptions, and expectations of the author. Some things to consider when analysing the document are the following (this list is only a guideline):
The final stage of the Essay/Exercise is to state your conclusion or answer to the problem under discussion. This should be based upon the information and interpretations you have gleaned from reading both primary and secondary sources. The questions you should keep in mind include the following:
Films:
William Blake, "Europe Supported by Africa and America" (1793) | Idealized depictions of "Europe", "Africa", "Asia" and "America" (1776) |
[See the Lecture Notes for this topic.]
Familiarize yourselves with the maps in the Reader of Primary Sources
Some basic questions to consider (for this Seminar, the Textbook Seminar and for the subject as a whole) include the following:
Please note: The full bibliography is only available online.
The Penguin Atlas of World History, 2 vols., ed. Herman Kinder and Werner Hilgermann (Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1978). Volume 2 deals with the period From the French Revolution to the Present.
Norman J.G. Pounds, An Historical Geography of Europe, 1500-1840 (Cambridge University Press, 1979).
The Penguin Dictionary of Modern History, 1789-1945, ed. Alan Palmer, 2nd edition (Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1983).
The Penguin Dictionary of Twentieth-Century History, 1900-1989, ed. Alan Palmer, 2nd edition (Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1990).
The Barr Smith Library's "Library Information Services History Home Page": http://library.adelaide.edu.au/guide/hum/history
Dennis A. Trinkle et al., The History Highway: A Guide to Internet Resources (Armonk, New York: M.E. Sharpe, 1997). The History Highway Website is: http://www.uc.edu/www/history/highway.html
An older collection of historical opinion about the 19thC: A Century for Debate, 1789-1914: Problems in the Interpretation of European History, ed. Peter N. Stearns (New York: Dodd, Mead & Co., 1975). Chap. XV "The Nature of the Nineteenth Century" - essays by Ford, Murray, Keynes, Croce, Hayes, Mosse, pp. 472-511.
Grant and Temperley's Europe in the Nineteenth and Twentieth Centuries (7th ed.) volume 1 by Agatha Ramm, Europe in the Nineteenth Century, 1789-1905 (London: Longman, 1984).
Robert Gildea, Barricades and Borders: Europe 1800-1914 (Oxford University Press, 1987).
Chris Cook and John Paxton, European Political Facts, 1789-1848 (Macmillan, 1981).
Chris Cook and John Paxton, European Political Facts, 1848-1918 (New York: Facts on File, 1978).
Roger Magraw, France 1815-1914: The Bourgeois Century (Fontana, 1983).
James Sheehan, German History 1770-1866 (Oxford University Press, 1990).
Gordon Craig, Germany 1866-1945 (Oxford University Press, 1980).
B. Jelavich, Modern Austria: Empire and Republic, 1815-1986 (Cambridge University Press, 1987).
Norman McCord, British History, 1815-1906 (Oxford University Press, 1991).
The History of the Idea of Europe, ed. Kevin Wilson and Jan van der Dussen (London: Routledge, 1995).
Culture and Identity in Europe: Perceptions of Divergence and Unity in Past and Present, ed. Michael Wintle (Aldershot: Avebury, 1996).
Denys Hay, Europe: The Emergence of an Idea (New York: Harper Torchbooks, 1966).
Die Idee Europa, 1300-1946: Quellen zur Geschichte der politischen Einigung, ed. Rolf Hellmut Foester (dtv documente1963).
E.L. Jones, The European Miracle: Environments, Economies and Geopolitics in the History of Europe and Asia (Cambridge University Press, 1981).
Nathan Rosenberg and L.E. Birdzell, Jr., How the West Grew Rich: The Economic Transformation of the Industrial World (New York: Basic Books, 1986).
J.M. Roberts, The Triumph of the West (London: BBC, 1985).
The Oxford, Blackwell series "The Making of Europe" ed. Jacques Le Goff:
Francis Haskell, History and its Images: Art and the Interpretation. of the Past (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1993).
Susan Woodford, Looking at Pictures (Cambridge University Press, 1995).
Art and History: Images and their Meaning, ed. Robert I. Rotberg and Theodore K. Rabb (Cambridge University Press, 1988).
Albert Boime, A Social History of Modern Art (University of Chicago Press)
|
Selectively read one of the following subject textbooks by Hamerow (from a liberal perspective) or Hobsbawm (from a Marxist perspective):
Note: It is not necessary to read all three volumes of Hobsbawm and Hamerow's textbook for this seminar! Begin by reading the introduction and conclusion to the volume (or volumes) you have chosen, then use the table of contents and index to find other bits to skim.
We should begin by asking ourselves "who are the people who have written our textbooks?" We need to know something about:
A useful exercise is to compare (to find similarities) and contrast (to find differences) the interpretation of 19th century European history of Theodore Hamerow and Eric Hobsbawm, in particular their interpretation of the impact and importance of the "twin revolutions" of the 19thC (i.e. the French and Industrial Rdevolutions). Some of the points you might like to consider were raised in last week's tutorial concerning periodization, key events and processes, method, and so on:
Concerning Theodore Hamerow, The Birth of a New Europe (1983)
Concerning Eric Hobsbawm, The Age of Revolution, 1789-1848 (1962);The Age of Capital, 1848-1875 (1975);The Age of Empire, 1875-1914 (1987)
How do other historians (like Ramm and Gildea) approach the subject?
Everyone should write and bring to the Seminar a 500 word paper on one of the following topics about either Hamerow or Hobsbawm:
Please note: The full bibliography is only available online.
The Blackwell Dictionary of Historians, ed. J. Canon et al. (Oxford: Blackwell, 1988).
Great Historians of the Modern Age: An International Dictionary, ed. L. Boia (1991).
Jean-Pierre v. m. Herubel, "CLIO'S DARK MUSINGS?: A REVIEW ESSAY", Libraries & Culture, 1988 23(4): 493-498.
Eugene D. Genovese, "The Politics of Class Struggle in the History of Society: An Appraisal of the Work of Eric Hobsbawm," in The Power of the Past: Essays for Eric Hobsbawm, ed. Pat Thane et al. (Cambridge University Press, 1984), pp. 13-36
Keith McClelland, "Bibliography of the Writings of Eric Hobsbawm," (up to 1982) in Culture, Ideology and Politics: Essays for Eric Hobsbawm, ed. Raphael Samuel and Gareth Stedman Jones (London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1982), pp. 332-63.
Combined Retrospective Index to Book Reviews in Scholarly Journals (1886-1974). 15 vols. 1979-1982.
Book Review Digest (1905-)
Book Review Index (1905-).
Humanites Index (1907-). CD-ROM from 1984-
Social Sciences Index (1907-). CD-ROM from 1983-
Arts and Humanities Citation Index (1976-). CD-ROM from 1992-
|
Theodore S. Hamerow, The Birth of a New Europe (1983). A very striking omission in Hamerow's book is a separate chapter dealing with the problem of revolution in general in the 19thC and the imapct of the French Revolution in particular. Why is this?
Eric Hobsbawm - as one might expect from a Marxist, revolution plays a very important part in Hobsbawm's accounts, both as the legacy of the French Revolution and as a foretaste of what is to come in the socialist revolutions of the 20th century.
Hobsbawm's defense of Marxist interpretations of the French Revolution on the occasion of the bicentennial: E.J. Hobsbawm, Echoes of the Marseillaise: Two Centuries Look Back on the French Revolution (London: Verso, 1990).
The Permanent Revolution: The French Revolution and its Legacy, 1789-1989, ed. Geoffrey Best (University of Chicago Press, 1989).
William Doyle, The Oxford History of the French Revolution (Oxford University Press, 1990). Ch. 11 "Government by Terror, 1793-1795," pp. 247-71; Ch. 12 "Thermidor, 1794-1795," pp. 272-96.
A Critical Dictionary of the French Revolution, ed. François Furet and Mona Ozouf, trans. Arthur Goldhammer (Harvard University Press, 1989).
Sources Relevant to the Film:
Other Sources:
See the handout on Andrzej Wajda, Danton (1982) 2hrs 16 (LD)
You are required to hand in a Primary Source Exercise, a Film Analysis Exercise and a Major Essay. The major Essay is due at the end of the semester. The first exercise (either on a Primary Source or on a Film) is due in the mid-semester break. The second exercise (either on a Primary Source or on a Film) is due at the relevant Seminar in the second half of the semester. You must choose a different Seminar Topic for each of these pieces of written work, in other words there can be no doubling up of topics.
"Select one of the Primary Sources in the Reader of Primary Sources and answer the following questions: what kind of primary source is it, who wrote (or painted) it, when was it written, why was it written, what does the source tell us about the past?"
In your answer you should
"Select one of the feature films shown in this Subject and, by using at least one of the primary sources in the Reader of Primary Sources, assess the historical accuracy of the film and account for any discrepancies you find."
In your answer you should
Please note: The full bibliography is only available online.
Norman Hampson, Danton (New York: Holmes and Meier, 1978).
Mona Ozouf, "Danton," in A Critical Dictionary of the French Revolution, ed. François Furet and Mona Ozouf, trans. Arthur Goldhammer (Harvard University Press, 1989), pp. 213-222.
Robespierre, ed. George Rudé (New Jersey: Prentice Hall, 1967).
Patrice Gueniffey, "Robespierre" in A Critical Dictionary of the French Revolution, ed. François Furet and Mona Ozouf, trans. Arthur Goldhammer (Harvard University Press, 1989), pp. 298-312.
George Rudé, Robespierre: Portrait of a Revolutionary Democrat (London: Collins, 1975).
"Andrzej Wajda" in World Film Directors. Volume 2, ed. John Wakeman (New York: H.W. Wilson, 1987), pp. 1148-55.
Mrs. B. Urgolsikova, "Andrzej Wajda" in The International Dictionary of Films and Filmmakers: Volume 2 Directors/Filmmakers, ed. Christopher Lyon (London: Macmillan, 1987), pp. 567-570.
Robert Darnton, "Danton," in Past Imperfect: History according to the Movies, ed. Mark C. Carnes (New York: Henry Holt, 1995), pp. 104-109.
Robert Darnton, "Film: Danton and Double Entendre," The Kiss of Lamourette: Reflections on Cultural History (New York: W.W. Norton, 1990), pp. 37-52.
An influential non-Marxist (or anti-Marxist) critique is provided by François Furet, Interpreting the French Revolution, trans. Elborg Forster (Cambridge University Press, 1981).
Daniel Arasse, The Guillotine and the Terror, trans. Christopher Miller (Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1991).
A Century for Debate, 1789-1914: Problems in the Interpretation of European History, ed. Peter N. Stearns (New York: Dodd, Mead & Co., 1975). Chap.I "The Impact of the French Revolution," pp. 1-30. Essays by Carlyle, Brinton, Lefebvre, Cobban, Rudé.
R.R. Palmer, Twelve Who Ruled: The Year of the Terror in the French Revolution (New York: Atheneum, 1965).
A Statue of Napoleon overturned by the Communards in 1870 | A Statue of Victoria toppled in the struggle for independence in Georgetown, Guyana, 1966 |
[See the Lecture Notes for this topic.]
Theodore S. Hamerow, The Birth of a New Europe (1983). Hamerow has little to say directly about the power of monarchs and the symbolic representation of that power. Chap. 12 "The Nature of Authority" is a general discussion of the transition from oligarchic forms of government to more popular forms.
Eric Hobsbawm also stresses the emerging new social and political groups which replaced the traditional aristocratic class.
The essays by David Cannadine, "The Context, Performance and Meaning of Ritual: The British Monarchy and the 'Invention of Tradition', c.1820-1977," and Eric Hobsbawm, "Mass-Producing Traditions: Europe, 1870-1914," in The Invention of Tradition, ed. Eric Hobsbawm and Terence Ranger (Cambridge University Press, 1995).
Arno Mayer argues that historians like Hamerow and Hobsbawm have exaggerated the extent of change in political and social power, and that monarchs and traditional aristocratic elites retained considerable power well into the 19thC and even into the 20thC: Arno J. Mayer, The Persistence of the Old Regime: Europe to the Great War (New York: Pantheon, 1981).
Sources Relevant to the Film:
Images of imperial or royal power:
Images of republican power and authority:
See the handout on Abel Gance, Napoleon (1927) (LD) Part 1 2hrs or Part 2 1hr 51
Concerning the power of monarchs and the depiction of that power in the 19thC:
The great challenge to monarchical power came from the republican tradition issuing from the American (1776) and French Revolutions (1789, 1848, 1871). This other political tradition also had its imagery and rituals:
What did the figure of "Britannia" represent in the 19thC?
An historiographical question arises with the claim by Mayer that the power of the old regime "persisted" well into the late 19thC in spite of the forces of democracy and the industrial revolution:
You are required to hand in a Primary Source Exercise, a Film Analysis Exercise and a Major Essay. The major Essay is due at the end of the semester. The first exercise (either on a Primary Source or on a Film) is due in the mid-semester break. The second exercise (either on a Primary Source or on a Film) is due at the relevant Seminar in the second half of the semester. You must choose a different Seminar Topic for each of these pieces of written work, in other words there can be no doubling up of topics.
"Select one of the Primary Sources in the Reader of Primary Sources and answer the following questions: what kind of primary source is it, who wrote (or painted) it, when was it written, why was it written, what does the source tell us about the past?"
In your answer you should
"Select one of the feature films shown in this Subject and, by using at least one of the primary sources in the Reader of Primary Sources, assess the historical accuracy of the film and account for any discrepancies you find."
In your answer you should
Please note: The full bibliography is only available online.
Monarchical or Imperial Power:
Toppled Monarchs
Republican Power - Marianne (the Republic, Liberty):
David Cannadine, "The Context, Performance and Meaning of Ritual: The British Monarchy and the 'Invention of Tradition', c.1820-1977," in The Invention of Tradition, ed. Eric Hobsbawm and Terence Ranger (Cambridge University Press, 1995), pp. 101-64.
Eric Hobsbawm, "Mass-Producing Traditions: Europe, 1870-1914," in The Invention of Tradition, ed. Eric Hobsbawm and Terence Ranger (Cambridge University Press, 1995), pp. 263-307.
For an anthropologist's perspective which is broadranging and stimulating: Clifford Geertz, "Centers, Kings and Charisma: Reflections on the Symbolics of Power," in Rites of Power: Symbolism, Ritual, and Politics Since the Middle Ages, ed. Sean Wilentz (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1985), pp. 13-38.
Simon Schama, "The Domestication of Majesty: Royal Family Portraiture, 1500-1850," Journal of Interdisciplinary History, vol. 17, 1986, pp. 155-83.
Richard A. Jackson, Vive le roi! A History of the French Coronation from Charles V to Charles X (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1984). Part Five: The Coronation in History anbd Chap. 12 "After Napoleon, the Denoument".
Lynn Hunt, Politics, Culture and Class in the French Revolution (University of California Press, 1984). Part I: The Poetics of Power" - Chap. 1"The Rhetoric of Revolution," pp. 19-51; Chap. 2 "Symbolic Forms of Political Practice," pp. 52-86; Chap. 3 "The Imagery of Radicalism," pp. 87-119.
Mona Ozouf, Festivals and the French Revolution (Harvard University Press, 1988).
Albert Boime, Art in an Age of Bonapartism, 1800-1815 (University of Chicago Press, 1990). Chap. 2 "The Iconography of Napoleon," pp. 35-95.
Martyn Lyons, Napoleon Bonaparte and the Legacy of the French Revolution (London: Macmillan, 1994). Chap. 13 "Art, Propaganda and the Cult of Personality," pp. 178-94.
Warren Roberts, Jacques-Louis David, Revolutionary Artist: Art, Politics, and the French Revolution (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1989). Chap. 4 "David and Napoleon," pp. 129-86.
Maurice Agulhon, "Politics, Images, and Symbols in Post-Revolutionary France," in Rites of Power: Symbolism, Ritual, and Politics Since the Middle Ages, ed. Sean Wilentz (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1985), pp. 177-205.
David Cannadine, "The Context, Performance and Meaning of Ritual: The British Monarchy and the 'Invention of Tradition', c.1820-1977," in The Invention of Tradition, ed. Eric Hobsbawm and Terence Ranger (Cambridge University Press, 1995), pp. 101-64.
Crown Pictorial: Art and the English Monarchy, ed. Linda Colley et al. (New Haven, Conn.: 1990).
Linda Colley, "The Apotheosis of George III: Loyalty, Royalty and the British Nation, 1760-1820," Past and Present, vol. 102, February 1984, pp. 94-129.
Remaking Queen Victoria, ed. Margaret Homans and Adrienne Munich (Cambridge University Press, 1997). See the essays by:
Lytton Strachey, The Illustrated Queen Victoria (1921), ed. Michael Holdroyd (London: Bloomsbury, 1987).
Elisabeth Fehrenbach "Images of Kaiserdom: German Attitudes to Kaiser Wilhelm II," in Kaiser Wilhelm II: New Interpretations, ed. John C. G. Röhl and Nicolaus Sombart (Cambridge University Press, 1982), pp.269-85.
Michael Balfour, The Kaiser and His Times (Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1975). Several interesting photographs.
Richard S. Wortman, "Moscow and Petersburg: The Problem of Political Center in Tsarist Russia, 1881-1914," in Rites of Power: Symbolism, Ritual, and Politics Since the Middle Ages, ed. Sean Wilentz (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1985), pp. 244-71.
Richard S. Wortman, Scenarios of Power: Myth and Ceremony in Russian Monarchy. Vol. One From Peter the Great to the Death of Nicholas 1 (Princeton University Press, 1995).
Marie Tanner, The Last Descendant of Aeneas: The Hapsburgs and the Mythic Image of Emperor (New Haven, 1993).
Maurice Agulhon, Marianne into Battle: Republican Imagery and Symbolism in France, 1789-1880, trans. Janet Lloyd (Cambridge University press, 1981).
Marvin Trachtenberg, The Statue of Liberty (London: Penguin, 1976).
|
[See the Lecture Notes for this topic. Also this and this.]
PLEASE NOTE: SEMINAR DEBATE TOPIC
From the perspective of either the classical liberal John Stuart Mill or the socialist Karl Marx, debate the following question:
Theodore S. Hamerow, The Birth of a New Europe (1983): Chap. 8 The Emergence of the Labor Question"; Chap. 9 "Civic Ideologies and Social Values"
Eric Hobsbawm
Himmelfarb's "Introduction," pp. 7-49 to John Stuart Mill, On Liberty (1859), ed. Gertrude Himmelfarb (Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1984).
Taylor's "Introduction," pp. 7-47 to Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels, The Communist Manifesto (1848), ed. A.J.P. Taylor (Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1985).
Eric Hobsbawm's Introduction to the 150th anniversary edition of Karl Marx and Federick Engels, The Communist Manifesto: A Modern Edition (London: Verso, 1998), pp. 1-29.
There is no film for this topic.
Socialism/Marxism
Classical Liberalism
You are required to hand in a Primary Source Exercise, a Film Analysis Exercise and a Major Essay. The major Essay is due at the end of the semester. The first exercise (either on a Primary Source or on a Film) is due in the mid-semester break. The second exercise (either on a Primary Source or on a Film) is due at the relevant Seminar in the second half of the semester. You must choose a different Seminar Topic for each of these pieces of written work, in other words there can be no doubling up of topics.
"Select one of the Primary Sources in the Reader of Primary Sources and answer the following questions: what kind of primary source is it, who wrote (or painted) it, when was it written, why was it written, what does the source tell us about the past?"
In your answer you should
"Select one of the feature films shown in this Subject and, by using at least one of the primary sources in the Reader of Primary Sources, assess the historical accuracy of the film and account for any discrepancies you find."
In your answer you should
Please note: The full bibliography is only available online.
John Stuart Mill, On Liberty (1859), ed. Gertrude Himmelfarb (Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1984). Himmelfarb's "Introduction," pp. 7-49 and Mill's "Introductory," pp. 59-74.
John Stuart Mill, On Liberty and Other Essays, ed. John Gray (Oxford University Press, 1991). John Gray's introduction pp. vii-xxx and Mill's essay.
A very useful, comprehensive anthology of classical liberal writers with a lengthy historical introduction: Western Liberalism: A History in Documents from Locke to Croce, ed. E.K. Bramsted and K.J. Melhuish (London: Longamn, 1978).
Herbert Spencer, The Man vs. the State (1884) - E-Text:
Karl Marx and Friedrich. Engels, The Communist Manifesto (1848), ed. A.J.P. Taylor (Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1985). Taylor's "Introduction," pp. 7-47 and the "Manifesto."
An anthology of pre-Marxist socialist writers: Before Marx: Socialism and Communism in France, 1830-48, ed. Paul Corcoran (London: Macmillan).
Gertrude Himmelfarb, On Liberty and Liberalism: The Case of John Stuart Mill (New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1974). Chap. 1 "'One Very Simple Principle'," pp. 3-22.
William Thomas, J.S. Mill (Oxford Past Masters: Oxford University Press, 1985).
John M. Robson, The Improvement of Mankind (University of Toronto Press, 1968).
Alan Ryan, J.S. Mill (London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1974).
John Gray, Liberalism (Milton Keynes: Open University Press, 1986).
David McLellan, Karl Marx (Fontana Modern Masters).
David McLellan, Karl Marx: His Life and Thought (New York: Harper, 1977).
Shlomo Avinieri, The Social and Political Thought of Karl Marx (Cambridge University Press, 1968).
David McClellan, Karl Marx: His Life and Thought (New York: Harper, 1977).
Alan Gilbert, Marx's Politics: Communists and Citizens (Oxford: Martin Robertson, 1981). Chap. VIII "The Communist Manifesto and Marx's Strategies," pp. 125-35.
John M. Maguire, Marx's Theory of Politics (Cambridge University Press, 1978). Chap 2 "Perspectives on Revolution: Marx's Position on the Eve of 1848," pp. 28-47.
Thomas Sowell, Marxism: Philosophy and Economics (New York: William Morrow and Co., 1985).
George Lichtheim, A Short History of Socialism (London, 1970).
R.N. Berki, Socialism (New York: St. Martin's Press, 1975). Chap. 4 "The Nature of the Marxian Achievement," pp. 56-72.
G.D.H. Cole, A History of Socialist Thought, 5 vols (London: Macmillan, 1953-).
Alexander Gray, The Socialist Tradition: Moses to Lenin (London: Longman's, 1963).
Anthony Arblaster, The Rise and Decline of Western Liberalism (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1984).
John Gray, Liberalism (Milton Keynes: Open University Press, 1986).
See the Web Site for my subject "Liberal Europe and Social Change 1815-1914"
See the Web Site of my PhD on early 19thC French liberal thought: CLASS ANALYSIS, SLAVERY AND THE INDUSTRIALIST THEORY OF HISTORY IN FRENCH LIBERAL THOUGHT, 1814-1830: THE RADICAL LIBERALISM OF CHARLES COMTE AND CHARLES DUNOYER (1994).
James J. Sheehan, German Liberalism in the Nineteenth Century (London: Methuen, 1982).
Gordon A. Craig, The Triumph of Liberalism: Zurich in the Golden Age, 1830-1869 (New York: Collier, 1988).
André Jardin, History of Political Liberalism in France from the Crisis of Absolutism to the Constitution of 1875 (1985).
Massimo Salvadori,The Liberal Heresy: Origins and Historical Development (London: Macmillan, 1977).
D.J. Manning, Liberalism (London: J.M. Dent and Sons, 1982).
Ludwig von Mises, Liberalism: A Socio-Economic Exposition, tr. Ralph Raico (Kansas City: Sheed Andrews and McMeel, 1978).
Steven Lukes, Individualism (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1973).
Guido de Ruggiero, The History of European Liberalism, trans. R.G. Collingwood (Boston: Beacon Press, 1959).
|
[See the Lecture Notes for this topic. And this.]
Theodore S. Hamerow, The Birth of a New Europe (1983). There is very little on the abolition of serfdom and slavery in Hamerow. Chap. 2 "The Transformation of Agriculture" puts serfdom into the broader context of agricultural change.
Eric Hobsbawm: again, very little of the emancipation of serfs and slaves per se, although the theme of "emancipation" pervades the trilogy of texts.
The most comprehensive and detailed account of the ending of serfdom in Europe over the period 1771 (Savoy) to 1864 (Roumania): Jerome Blum, The End of the Old Order in Rural Europe (Princeton University Press, 1978). Part One describes the traditional life of peasants and serfs. Part Two deals with the early efforts at reform from above - see Chap. 14 "The Old Order Attacked and Defended" for summaries of the main arguments used in the debate; and Chap. 15 "Peasant Unrest" on the pressure from below. Part Three deals extensively with Emancipation.
An excellent comparative account which examines slavery and abolition in the British, American, French, and Spanish colonies and metropoles: Robin Blackburn, The Overthrow of Colonial Slavery 1776-1848 (London: Verso, 1988). See the early chapters for the impact of the American and French Revolutions on slavery and abolitionism. Chap. XI "The Struggle for British Slave Emancipation: 1823-38" and Chap. XII "French Restoration Slavery and 1848" are the most relevant to our needs.
Albert Boime, "The Revulsion to Cruelty," The Art of Exclusion: Representing Blacks in the Nineteenth Century (London: Thames and Hudson, 1990), pp. 47-78.
Sources Relevant to the Film:
Other Sources:
See the handout on Steven Spielberg, Amistad (1997) 2hrs 35.
You are required to hand in a Primary Source Exercise, a Film Analysis Exercise and a Major Essay. The major Essay is due at the end of the semester. The first exercise (either on a Primary Source or on a Film) is due in the mid-semester break. The second exercise (either on a Primary Source or on a Film) is due at the relevant Seminar in the second half of the semester. You must choose a different Seminar Topic for each of these pieces of written work, in other words there can be no doubling up of topics.
"Select one of the Primary Sources in the Reader of Primary Sources and answer the following questions: what kind of primary source is it, who wrote (or painted) it, when was it written, why was it written, what does the source tell us about the past?"
In your answer you should
"Select one of the feature films shown in this Subject and, by using at least one of the primary sources in the Reader of Primary Sources, assess the historical accuracy of the film and account for any discrepancies you find."
In your answer you should
Please note: The full bibliography is only available online.
Alexis de Tocqueville, "Report on Abolition" (1839) in Tocqueville and Beaumont on Social Reform, ed. Seymour Drescher (1968), extracts from pp. 98-105, 111-117, 128-32, 135-36.
Images
Extracts from contemporary travellers' accounts of peasant life and emancipation documents. Documents of European Economic History, ed. S. Pollard and C. Holmes (London: Edward Arnold, 1968). Vol. One - "The Process of Industrialization 1750-1870":
Contains a good chapter on European racism as a justification for black slavery: William B. Cohen, The French Encounter with Africans: White Response to Blacks, 1530-1880 (Indiana University Press, 1980). Chap. 7 "The Nineteenth Century Confronts Slavery, pp. 181-209 and Chap. 8 "Scientific Racism," pp. 210-62.
Politics and the Public Conscience: Slave Emancipation and the Abolitionist Movement in Britain, ed. Edith F. Hurwitz (London: George Allen and Unwin, 1973).
Alexis de Tocqueville, "Part 3: Abolition of Slavery," (1839, 1843) in Tocqueville and Beaumont on Social Reform, ed. Seymour Drescher (New York: Harper and Row, 1968), pp. 98-173.
David Brion Davis, The Problem of Slavery in the Age of Revolution, 1770-1823 (Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press, 1975)
Additional bibliography on the Amistad case.
Bertram Wyatt-Brown, Review of Amistad in The Journal of American History, December 1998, pp. 1174-76.
Dominic Lieven, The Aristocracy in Europe, 1815-1914 (New York : Columbia University Press, 1993).
Terrence Emmons, The Russian Landed Gentry and the Peasant Emancipation (Cambridge University Press, 1968).
Annie Moulin, Peasantry and Society in France since 1789, trans. M.C. and M.F. Cleary (Cambridge University Press, 1988).
Our Forgotten Past: Seven Centuries of Life on the Land, ed. J. Blum (London: Thames and Hudson, 1982). Excellent general survey with a good selection of art dealing with peasant life. See especially Blum," The Nobility and the Land," pp. 33-56; Blum, "From Servitude to Freedom," pp. 57-80.
Werner Rösener, The Peasantry of Europe, trans. Thomas M. Barker (Oxford: Blackwell, 1995). Chap. 9. "Economic Shifts, Nutritional Problems and Rural Society," pp. 142-56 and Chap. 11 "Emancipation and Reform," pp.171-87.
Winthrop D. Jordan, White Over Black: American Attitudes Toward the Negro, 1550-1812 (New York: Norton, 1977).
Seymour Drescher, "The Abolition of Slavery," Dilemmas of Democracy: Tocqueville and Modernization (University of Pittsburgh Press, 1968), pp. 151-95.
Sally Gershman, "Alexis de Tocqueville and Slavery," French Historical Studies, 1976, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 467-83.
Mary Lawlor, "The Right of Search" and "Slavery in the French Colonies" in Alexis de Tocqueville in the Chamber of Deputies: His Views on Foreign and Colonial Policy (Washington, D.C.: The Catholic University of America Press, 1959), pp. 67-130.
Slavery and British Society 1776-1846, ed. James Walvin (London: Macmillan, 1982).
Howard Temperley, British Anti-Slavery, 1823-1870 (London: Longman, 1972).
Lawrence C. Jennings, "France, Great Britain and the Repression of the Slave Trade, 1841-1845," French Historical Studies, 1977, vol. 10, pp. 101-25.
Lawrence C. Jennings, "The French Press and Great Britain's Campaign against the Slave Trade, 1830-1848," Revue française d'Histoire d'Outre-Mer, 1980, vol. 67, no. 246-247, pp. 5-24.
Serge Daget, "A Model of the French Abolitionist Movement and its Variations," in Anti-Slavery, Religion and Reform: Essays in Memory of Roger Anstey, ed. Christine Bolt and Seymour Drescher (Folkstone: William Dawson, 1980), pp. 64-79.
Anti-Slavery, Religion and Reform: Essays in Memory of Roger Anstey, ed. Christine Bolt and Seymour Drescher (Folkstone: William Dawson, 1980).
Betty Fladeland, Abolitionists and Working Class Problems in the Age of Industrialization (London: Macmillan, 1984). Especially the chapter on Harriet Martineau.
Louis Billington and Rosamund Billington, "'A Burning Zeal for Righteousness': Women in the British Anti-Slavery Movement, 1820-1860," in Equal or Different: Women's Politics 1800-1914, ed. Jane Rendall (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1987), pp. 82-111.
The debate between Haskell, Davis and Ashworth in a "Forum" in the American Historical Review in October 1987 originating from Davis's book and Haskell's earlier articles:
The above essays and other material is collected in The Antislavery Debate: Capitalism and Abolitionism as a Problem in Historical Interpretation, ed. Thomas Bender (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1992).
Albert Boime, The Art of Exclusion: Representing Blacks in the Nineteenth Century (London: Thames and Hudson, 1990).
Hugh Honour
David Brion Davis, The Problem of Slavery in Western Culture (Penguin, 1970).
David Brion Davis, Slavery and Human Progress (Oxford University Press, 1984).
Sidney Pollard, "Agriculture: Emancipation, Markets and Dynamics," in Peaceful Conquest: The Industrialization of Europe, 1760-1970 (Oxford University Press, 1981), pp. 192-200.
Texts to come
Daniel Field, The End of Serfdom: Nobility and Bureaucracy in Russia, 1855-1861 (Harvard University Press, 1976).
Jerome Blum, The End of the Old Order in Rural Europe (Princeton University Press, 1978).
J.B. Hirst, Convict Socierty and its Enemies: A History of Early New South Wales (Sydney: George Allen and Unwin, 1985).
Colin Forster, France and Botany Bay: The Lure of a Penal Colony (Melbourne University Press, 1996).
|
[See the Lecture Notes for this topic.]
PLEASE NOTE: SEMINAR DEBATE TOPIC
Take the perspective of an "optimist" like the historian Max Hartwell (and/or the 19thC manufacturer Ure) or a critic/pessimist like the historian Eric Hobsbawm (and/or the 19thC manufacturer and colleague of Karl Marx, Friedrich Engels), and argue for or against the following proposition:
Theodore S. Hamerow, The Birth of a New Europe: State and Society in the Nineteenth Century (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1983). Especially Chapter 5 "The Standard of Living" but also chapters 1, 4, 7, and 8.
Eric Hobsbawm:
The Industrial Revolution in Britain: Triumph or Disaster? (revised ed.), ed. Philip A.M. Taylor (Lexington, Mass.: D.C. Heath, 1970). Essays by Hobsbawm and Hartwell, pp. 25-43.
The Standard of Living in Britain in the Industrial Revolution, ed. A.J. Taylor (London, 1975).
The Industrial Revolution in Comparative Perspective, ed. Porter and Teich ().
Sources Relevant to the Film:
Other Sources:
See the handout on
You are required to hand in a Primary Source Exercise, a Film Analysis Exercise and a Major Essay. The major Essay is due at the end of the semester. The first exercise (either on a Primary Source or on a Film) is due in the mid-semester break. The second exercise (either on a Primary Source or on a Film) is due at the relevant Seminar in the second half of the semester. You must choose a different Seminar Topic for each of these pieces of written work, in other words there can be no doubling up of topics.
"Select one of the Primary Sources in the Reader of Primary Sources and answer the following questions: what kind of primary source is it, who wrote (or painted) it, when was it written, why was it written, what does the source tell us about the past?"
In your answer you should
"Select one of the feature films shown in this Subject and, by using at least one of the primary sources in the Reader of Primary Sources, assess the historical accuracy of the film and account for any discrepancies you find."
In your answer you should
Please note: The full bibliography is only available online.
The anthology of primary sources: Nature and Industrialization, ed. Alasdair Clayre (Oxford University Press, 1977). See the extracts by Andrew Ure, pp. 67 ff.; Samuel Smiles, pp. 253 ff and Friedrich Engels, pp. 122 ff and 244 ff.
Another anthology which stresses the negative view: The Impact of the Industrial Revolution: Protest and Alienation, ed. Peter N. Stearns (Englewood, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1972).
Images
Émile Zola, L'Assomoir, trans. Leonard Tancock (Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1985).
Émile Zola, Germinal, (Harmondsworth: Penguin).
The Industrial Revolution in Britain: Triumph or Disaster? (revised ed.), ed. Philip A.M. Taylor (Lexington, Mass.: D.C. Heath, 1970). Essays by Hobsbawm and Hartwell, pp. 25-43.
E.J. Hobsbawm and R.M. Hartwell, "The Standard of Living during the Industrial Revolution: A Discussion," Economic History Review, 2nd series, vol. 16, 1963, no. 1.
A Century for Debate, 1789-1914: Problems in the Interpretation of European History, ed. Peter N. Stearns (New York: Dodd, Mead & Co., 1975). Chap. IV "The Working Class in the Early Industrial Revolution," pp. 94-128. Essays by Kuczynski, Ashton, Hobsbawm, Dolléans, Stearns.
E.J. Hobsbawm, The Pelican Economic History of Britain. Vol. 3: Industry and Empire, from 1750 to the Present Day (Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1970). Chap 4 "The Human Results of the Industrial Revolution 1750-1850," pp. 79-96.
E.P. Thompson, The Making of the English Working Class (New York: Vintage, 1966). Chap 6 "Exploitation," pp. 189-212 and Chap. 10 "Standards and Experiences," pp. 314-49.
J.G. Williamson, "Why was British Growth so Slow during the Industrial Revolution?" Journal of Economic History, September 1984, pp. 687-712.
Nathan Rosenberg and L.E. Birdzell, Jr., How the West Grew Rich: The Economic Transformation of the Industrial World (New York: Basic Books, 1986). Chap. 1 "Introduction"; Chap. 5 "The Development of Industry: 1750-1880".
R.M. Hartwell, "The Rising Standard of Living in England, 1800-1850" and "The Standard of Living: An Answer to The Pessimists," in R.M. Hartwell, The Industrial Revolution and Economic Growth (London: Methuen, 1971), pp. 313-60.
Jeffrey G. Williamson, Did British Capitalism Breed Inequality? (Boston: Allen and Unwin, 1985). Chap 2 "Real Wages and the Standard of Living," pp. 7-31.
W.H. Hutt, "The Factory System of the Early 19th Century," in Capitalism and the Historians, ed. F.A. Hayek (University of Chicago Press, 1963, pp. 156-184.
The Industrial Revolution and British Society, ed. Patrick O'Brien and Roland Quinault (Cambridge University Press, 1993).
David S. Landes, The Unbound Prometheus: Technological Change and Industrial Development in Western Europe from 1750 to the Present (Cambridge University Press, 1981). Chapter 2 and 3.
Phyllis Deane, The First Industrial Revolution (Cambridge University Press, 1990). Chap. 15 "Standards of Living," pp. 255-71.
T.S. Ashton, "The Standard of Life of the Workers in England, 1790-1830," in Capitalism and the Historians, ed. F.A. Hayek (University of Chicago Press, 1974), pp. 123-55.
The Long Debate on POVERTY: Eight Essays on Industrialisation and the 'Condition of England', ed. R.M. Hartwell et al. (London: Institute for Economic Affairs, 1972). Includes an essay on Engels which is critical of his use of sources.
Gertrude Himmelfarb, The Idea of Poverty: England in the Early Industrial Age (London: Faber and Faber, 1984).
Roger Magraw, France, 1815-1914: The Bourgeois Century (London: Fontana, 1983). Chap. 8 "Integration of the Worker," pp. 285-317.
Theodore Zeldin, France, 1848-1945. Vol I "Ambition and Love" chaps on "Women" pp. 343-62 and "Workers" pp. 198-282.
Austin Gough, "French Workers and their Wives," Labour History, May 1982.
Erna O. Hellerstein, Women, Social Order and the City: Rules for French Ladies (Dissertation, University of California, Berkely, 1980). Chap. 2 "French Women and the Orderly Household."
Martine Segalen, Love and Power in the Peasant Family: Rural France in the Nineteenth Century (Oxford, 1983).
Theresa McBride, The Domestic Revolution: The Modernization of Household Service in England and France, 1820-1920 (London, 1976).
Marilyn Boxer, "Women in Industrial Homework: The Flowermakers of Paris in the Belle Epoque," French Historical Studies, Spring 1982, vol. 12, pp. 401-23.
Joan Scott and Louise Tilly, "Women's Work and the Family in Nineteenth-Century Europe," Comparative Studies in Society and History, 1975, vol. 17, pp. 36-64.
Sidney Pollard, Peaceful Conquest: The Industrialization of Europe, 1760-1970 (Oxford University Press, 1981).
The Fontana Economic History of Europe, ed. Carlo M. Cipolla. The Emergence of Industrial Societies vols. 1 & 2. (Fontana, 1976).
Francis D. Klingender, Art and the Industrial Revolution, ed. Arthur Elton (St Albans: Paladin, 1975).
|
[See the Lecture Notes for this topic.]
Theodore S. Hamerow, The Birth of a New Europe: State and Society in the Nineteenth Century (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1983).
Eric Hobsbawm:
Note the monograph by Hobsbawm: Industry and Empire (Penguin, ).
Martin Van Crefeld, Technology and War from 2000BC to the Present (1989) (New York: The Free Press, 1991).
Daniel Headrick, The Tools of Empire: Technology and European Imperialism in the Nineteenth Century (Oxford University Prfess, 1981).
William H. McNeil, The Pursuit of Power: Technology, Armed Force, and Society since AD 1000 (University of Chicago Press, 1982).
Jon Ellis, The Social History of the Machine Gun (London: Cresset, 1975).
Sources Relevant to the Film:
Other Sources:
See the handout for the film:
You are required to hand in a Primary Source Exercise, a Film Analysis Exercise and a Major Essay. The major Essay is due at the end of the semester. The first exercise (either on a Primary Source or on a Film) is due in the mid-semester break. The second exercise (either on a Primary Source or on a Film) is due at the relevant Seminar in the second half of the semester. You must choose a different Seminar Topic for each of these pieces of written work, in other words there can be no doubling up of topics.
"Select one of the Primary Sources in the Reader of Primary Sources and answer the following questions: what kind of primary source is it, who wrote (or painted) it, when was it written, why was it written, what does the source tell us about the past?"
In your answer you should
"Select one of the feature films shown in this Subject and, by using at least one of the primary sources in the Reader of Primary Sources, assess the historical accuracy of the film and account for any discrepancies you find."
In your answer you should
Please note: The full bibliography is only available online.
Articles from the 1910-11 or "11th" edition of the Encyclopaedia Britannica (New York: Encyclopaedia Britannica, Inc., 1911)
Helmut von Moltke, Moltke on the Art of War: Selected Writings, ed. Daniel J. Hughes (1993) (Novato, Calif.: Presidio, 1995).
Friedrich von Berhardi, On War Today (London, 1912).
Jean de Bloch, Is War Now Impossible? The Future of War in its Technical, Economic and Political Relations (London, 1899).
H.G. Wells: Journalism and Prophecy, 1893-1946, ed. W. Warren Wagar (London: The Bodley Head, 1964). "War in the Twentieth Century," pp. 24-31; "Atomic Bombs," pp. 36-38; "The War in the Air," pp. 39-42; "Decadent World," pp. 176-80.
Norman Angell, The Great Illusion: The Relation of Military Power to National Advantage (1909) (London: William Heinemann, 1913).
Herbert Spencer
Friedrich Engels
Fontana History of European War and Society, ed. Geoffrey Best.
Paul Kennedy, The Rise and Fall of the Great Powers: Economic Change and Military Conflict from 1500 to 2000 (New York: Random House, 1987). "Strategy and Economics in the Industrial Era", especially the following chapters:
John U. Nef, Western Civilization since the Renaissance: Peace, War, Industry and the Arts (1950) (New York: Harper Torchbooks, 1963).
R.A. Buchanan, The Power of the Machine: The Impact of Technology from 1700 to the Present (1992) (Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1994).
Michael Howard, The Lessons of History (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1991).
Michael Howard, War in European History (Oxford University Press, 1979).
Martin Van Crefeld, Supplying War: Logistics from Wallenstein to Patton (Cambridge University Press, 1980).
War and Economic Devlopment: Essays in Memory of David Joslin, ed. J.M. Winter (Camridge University press, 1975).
I.F. Clarke, Voices Prophecying War: Future Wars 1763-3749 (Oxford University Press, 1992. Second edition).
Daniel Pick, War Machine: The Rationalisation of Slaughter in the Modern Age (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1993).
Philip Warner, The Crimean War: A Reappraisal (London, 1972).
Agatha Ramm, "The Crimean War," in The New Cambridge Modern History, vol. 10 "1830-70.
Gordon Craig, The Battle of Königgrätz: Prussia's Victory over Austria, 1866 (1964) (Westport, Conn.: Greenwood, 1975).
Michael Howard, The Franco-Prussian War: The German Invasion of France, 1870-71 (1961) (New York: Collier, 1969).
Jay Luvaas, The Military Legacy of the Civil War: The European Inheritance ( Chicago University Press, 1959).
Byron Farwell, The Boer War (London: Allen Lane, 1977).
Makers of Modern Strategy: From Machiavelli to the Nuclear Age, ed. Peter Paret (Princeton University Press, 1986)
Richard D. Challener, The French Theory of the Nation in Arms, 1866-1939 (New York, 1955).
Clausewitz and Modern Strategy, ed. Michael I. Handel (London: Frank Cass, 1986).
.
V.R. Berghahn, Militarism: The History of an International Debate, 1861-1979 (Cambridge University Press, 1984). Chap. 1 "The Debate Prior to 1914," pp. 1-30; Chap. III "The Debate on German and Japanese Militarism," pp. 49-60.
Gerhard Ritter, The Sword and the Scepter: The Problem of Militarism in Germany, trans. Heinz Norden (Coral Gables, Florida: University of Miami Press, 1969). Vol. 1 The Prussian Tradition, 1740-1890. "Introduction," pp. 5-13; Chap 8 "Moltke and Bismarck - Strategy and Policy," pp. 187-260.
Gordon A. Craig, The Politics of the Prussian Army, 1640-1945 (Oxford University Press, 1978). Chap. VI "The State within a State, 1871-1914," pp. 217-54.
Eckart Kehr, Economic Interest, Militarism, and Foreign Policy: Essays on German History, ed. Gordon A. Craig (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1977). Chap. 1 "The German Fleet in the Eighteen Nineties and the Politico-Military Dualism in the Empire," pp. 1-21.
Alfred Vagts, A History of Militarism: Civilian and Military (New York: Free Press, revised edition, 1967).
E.A. Pratt, The Rise of Rail Power in War and Conquest 1833-1914 (London, 1913).
J.F.C. Fuller, Armament and History (New York: Scribners, 1945).
Maurice Pearton, The Knowledgeable State: Diplomacy, War and Technology Since 1830 (London: Burnett, 1982).
Dennis Showalter, Railroads and Rifles: Technology and the Unification of Germany (1975) (Hamden, Conn.: Archon Press, 1986).
Daniel R. Headrick, The Tools of Empire: Technology and European Imperialism in the Nineteenth Century (Oxford University Prfess, 1981).
Daniel R. Headrick, The Tentacles of Progress: Technology Transfer in the Age of Imperialism, 1850-1940 (Oxford University Press, 1988).
Daniel R. Headrick, The Invisible Weapon: Telecommunications and International Politics, 1851-1945 (Oxford University Press, 1991).
T.H.E. Travers, "Technology, Tactics and Morale: Jean de Bloch, the Boer War, and British Military Theory 1900-1914," Journal of Modern European History, 1979, vol. 51, no. 2, pp 264-86.
I have done my duty: Florence Nightingale in the Crimean War, 1854-56, ed. Sue M. Goldie (University of Iowa Press, 1987).
Ever yours, Florence Nightingale. Selected Letters, ed. Martha Vicinus and Bea Nergaard (London: Virago, 1989).
I. Bernard Cohen, "Florence Nightingale," Scientific American, March 1984, vol. 250, no. 3, pp. 98-107.
Elspeth Huxley, Florence Nightingale (London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson, 1975), Chapter 3 "Chaos at Scutari," pp. 62-89; chapter 4 "Calamity Unparalleled," pp. 92-117; capter 5 "A Twelvemonth of Dirt," pp. 120-47; Chapter 6 "The Health of the Army," pp. 150-79.
Caroline Chapman, Russell of the Times: War Despatches and Diaries (London: Bell & Hyman, 1984).
William Howard Russell, Russell's Despatches from the Crimea, 1854-1856, ed. Nicolas Bentley (London: Deutsch, 1966).
P. Knightly, The First Casualty: From the Crimea to Vietnam: The War Correspondent as Hero, Propagandist, and Myth Maker (London: Harcourt Brace Yovanovich, 1975).
|
[See the Lecture Notes for this topic.]
PLEASE NOTE: SEMINAR DEBATE TOPIC
From the perspective of a 19th century opponent or a supporter of equal rights for women , argue for or against the proposition:
Perhaps all the men in the tutorial could argue against the proposition and all the women for it?
Theodore S. Hamerow, The Birth of a New Europe (1983). Why doesn't Hamerow have a chapter on women? Why doesn't he have a listing for "women" in the index? His chapter on manhood suffrage is Chap. 11 "The Enfranchisement of the Masses".
Eric Hobsbawm
Jane Rendall, The Origins of Modern Feminism: Women in Britain, France and the United States, 1780-1860 (London: Macmillan, 1985).
Karen Offen, "Liberty, Equality, and Justice for Women: The Theory and Practice of Feminism in Nineteenth-Century Europe," in Becoming Visible: Women in European History, ed. Renate Bridenthal, Claudia Koonz, Susan Stuard (Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1987, 2nd edition), pp. 335-73.
S. S. Holton, Feminism and Democracy: Women's Suffrage and Reform Politics in Britain, 1897-1918 (Cambridge University Press, 1986). Chap. 1 "'Feminising democracy': the ethos of the women's-suffrage movement", pp. 9-28 and Chap. 2 "Militants and constitutionalists" pp. 29-52.
Lisa Tickner, " The Hysterical Woman and the Shrieking Sisterhood" and "The Militant Woman" in The Spectacle of Women: Imagery of the Suffrage Campaign, 1907-14 (University of Chicago Press, 1988), pp. 192-213.
There is no film for this topic.
You are required to hand in a Primary Source Exercise, a Film Analysis Exercise and a Major Essay. The major Essay is due at the end of the semester. The first exercise (either on a Primary Source or on a Film) is due in the mid-semester break. The second exercise (either on a Primary Source or on a Film) is due at the relevant Seminar in the second half of the semester. You must choose a different Seminar Topic for each of these pieces of written work, in other words there can be no doubling up of topics.
"Select one of the Primary Sources in the Reader of Primary Sources and answer the following questions: what kind of primary source is it, who wrote (or painted) it, when was it written, why was it written, what does the source tell us about the past?"
In your answer you should
Please note: The full bibliography is only available online.
Some pioneering defences of the rights of women:
Karen M. Offen, Victorian Women: A Documentary Account of Women's Lives in Nineteenth-Century England, France and the United States (1981).
Women, the Family, and Freedom: The Debate in Documents, ed. Susan Groag Bell and Karen M. Offen (Stanford University Press, 1983). Vol. 1, 1750-1880 and Vol. 2 , 1880-1950.
Free and Ennobled: Source Readings in the Development of Victorian Feminism, ed. Carol Bauer and Lawrence Ritt (1983).
Émile Zola, L'Assomoir, trans. Leonard Tancock (Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1985).
Images of the suffrage campaign from Lisa Tickner, The Spectacle of Women: Imagery of the Suffrage Campaign, 1907-14 (University of Chicago Press, 1988):
John Stuart Mill, The Subjection of Women (1869) and Harriet Taylor, The Enfranchisement of Women, ed. Kate Soper (London: Virago Press, 1983).
Selected Articles on Woman Suffrage, ed. Edith M. Pelphs (White Plains, New York: H.W. Wilson, 1916).
John Stuart Mill, "On Marriage," "Statement on Marriage," "The Subjection of Women," "The Contagious Diseases Acts," and "Appendix A,B,C" in Collected Works vol. 21, ed. J.M. Robson (University of Toronto Press).
Jane Lewis, Before the Vote was Won: Arguments For and Against Women's Suffrage (London: Routledge and Keagan Paul, 1987).
Brian Harrison, Separate Spheres: The Opposition to Women's Suffrage in Britain (London: Croom Helm, 1978).
Becoming Visible: Women in European History, ed. Renate Bridenthal, Claudia Koonz, Susan Stuard (Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1987, 2nd edition).
Bonnie S. Anderson and Judith P. Zinsser, A History of their Own: Women in Europe from Prehistory to the Present, 2 vols. (Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1990).
Equal or Different: Women's Politics 1800-1914, ed. Jane Rendall (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1987).
Women's History, 1850-1945, ed. J. Purves (London: UCL Press, 1995).
Sandra Stanley Holton, Suffrage Days: Stories from the Women's Suffrage Movement (London: Routledge, 1996).
Lisa Tickner, A Spectacle of Women. Imagery of the Suffrage Campaign, 1907-14 (University of Chicago Press, 1988).
P. Thane, "Late Victorian Women" in T.R. Gourvish and A. O'Day, Later Victorian Britain, 1867-1900 (London: Macmillan Education, 1988), pp. 175-208.
S.S. Holton, "From Anti-Slavery to Suffrage Militancy. The Bright Circle, Elizabeth Cady Stanton and the British Women's Movement," in Suffrage and Beyond: International Feminist Perspectives, eds. C. Daley and M. Nolan (Auckland University Press, 1994), pp. 213-33.
S.S. Holton, '"To Educate Women into Rebellion." Elizabeth Cady Stanton and the Creation of a Transatlantic Network of Radical Suffragists," American Historical Review, 1994, vol. 99, pp. 1113-36.
Patrick Kay Bidelman, Pariahs Stand Up'. The Founding of the Liberal Feminist Movement in France, 1858-1889 (Westport, Connecticut, 1982).
Claire Goldberg Moses, French Feminism in the 19th Century (Albany: State University of New York Press, 1984).
Theodore Zeldin, France, 1848-1945. Vol I "Ambition and Love" chaps on "Women" pp. 343-62 and "Workers" pp. 198-282.
Austin Gough, "French Workers and their Wives," Labour History, May 1982.
Erna O. Hellerstein, Women, Social Order and the City: Rules for French Ladies (Dissertation, University of California, Berkely, 1980). Chap. 2 "French Women and the Orderly Household."
Martine Segalen, "Women in Rural Nineteenth-Century France," in Misérable et glorieuse, la femme du XIXe siècle, ed. J.-P. Aron. Translation by Ann Daughtry.
Martine Segalen, Love and Power in the Peasant Family: Rural France in the Nineteenth Century (Oxford, 1983).
Theresa McBride, The Domestic Revolution: The Modernization of Household Service in England and France, 1820-1920 (London, 1976).
Marilyn Boxer, "Women in Industrial Homework: The Flowermakers of Paris in the Belle Epoque," French Historical Studies, Spring 1982, vol. 12, pp. 401-23.
Joan Scott and Louise Tilly, "Women's Work and the Family in Nineteenth-Century Europe," Comparative Studies in Society and History, 1975, vol. 17, pp. 36-64.
German Women in the Nineteenth Century: A Social History, ed. John C. Fout (New York: Holmes and Meier, 1984).
Richard J. Evans, "Liberalism and Society: The Feminist Movement and Social Change," in Society and Politics in Wilhelmine Germany, ed. Richard J. Evans (New York: Barnes and Noble, 1978).
Amy Hacket, "Feminism and Liberalism in Wilhelmine Germany, 1890-1918," in Liberating Women's History: Theoretical and Critical Essays, ed. Berenice A. Carroll (Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1976).
Amy Hackett, "The German Women's Movement and Suffrage, 1890-1918: A Study of National Feminism," in Modern European Social History, ed. Robert J. Bezucha (Lexington, MA: Heath, 1976).
Susan Muller Okin, Women in Western Political Thought (London: Virago Press, 1980).
Patricia Hughes, "The Reality versus the Ideal: J.S. Mill's Treatment of Women, Workers, and Private Property," Canadian Journal of Political Science, 1979, vol. XII, no. 3, 523-54.
Julia Annas, "Mill and the Subjection of Women," Philosophy, 1977, vol. 52.
Audrey Oldfield, Woman Suffrage in Australia: A Gift or a Struggle? (Cambridge University Press, 1992).
|
[See the Lecture Notes for this topic.]
PLEASE NOTE: SEMINAR DEBATE TOPIC
We will conduct a "mock" court martial of Harry Morant and his fellow soldiers to retry them in the light of modern historical scholarship. The Seminar will be divided into 3 groups - one to prosecute Morant, one to defend Morant, and the third to act as "jury".
On imperialism, war, and nationalism - Theodore S. Hamerow, The Birth of a New Europe (1983): two general chapters on war and imperialism - Chap. 14 "The System of Warfare"; Chap. 15 "The Zenith of Imperialism"
Eric Hobsbawm
A useful one-volume survey of European imperialism: V.G. Kiernan, European Empires from Conquest to Collapse, 1815-1960 (Fontana, 1982).
On the Boer War see Thomas Pakenham, The Boer War (New York: Random House, 1994).
And the collection of essays: The South African War: The Anglo-Boer War, 1899-1902, ed. Peter Warwick (London: Longman, 1980). Especially Chap 4 by Fransjohan Pretorius "Life on Commando," pp. 103-22.
Extracts from "Editor's Commentary" to Breaker Morant and the Bushveldt Carbineers, ed. Arthur Davey (Cape Town: Van Riebeeck Society, 1987). Second Series No. 18. Pages xvii-lvi.
Fransjohan Pretorius "Life on Commando," in The South African War: The Anglo-Boer War, 1899-1902, ed. Peter Warwick (London: Longman, 1980), pp. 103-22.
Hallman B. Bryant, "'Breaker' Morant in Fact, Fiction and Film," Literature/Film Quarterly, 1987, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 138-45.
Sources Relevant to the Film:
See the handoout for Bruce Beresford, Breaker Morant (1980) 1hr 47 (DVD/WS).
You are required to hand in a Primary Source Exercise, a Film Analysis Exercise and a Major Essay. The major Essay is due at the end of the semester. The first exercise (either on a Primary Source or on a Film) is due in the mid-semester break. The second exercise (either on a Primary Source or on a Film) is due at the relevant Seminar in in the second half of the semester. You must choose a different Seminar Topic for each of these pieces of written work, in other words there can be no doubling up of topics.
"Select one of the Primary Sources in the Reader of Primary Sources and answer the following questions: what kind of primary source is it, who wrote (or painted) it, when was it written, why was it written, what does the source tell us about the past?"
In your answer you should
"Select one of the feature films shown in this Subject and, by using at least one of the primary sources in the Reader of Primary Sources, assess the historical accuracy of the film and account for any discrepancies you find."
In your answer you should
Please note: The full bibliography is only available online.
G.R. Witton, Scapegoats of the Empire: The True Story of Breaker Morant's Bushveldt Carbineers (Melbourne: D.W. Paterson, 1907). Reprinted 1982.
Jean de Bloch, "South Africa and Europe," The North American Review, April 1902, vol. 174, no. 4, pp. 489-504.
Works by the radical liberal journalist J.A. Hobson:
Bernard Porter, Critics of Empire: British Radical Attitudes to Colonialism in Africa,1895-1914 (London: Macmillan, 1968).
A.P. Thornton, The Imperial Idea and its Enemies: A Study in British Power (London: Macmillan, 1959).
Winston Churchill,The Boer War: London to Ladysmith via Pretoria. Ian Hamilton's March (1900)
Arthur Conan Doyle, The Great Boer War (London: Thomas Nelson and Sons, 1903). 16 editions appeared during the war. See especially pp. 11-15, 521.
Rudyard Kipling, Traffics and Discoveries (1904), ed. Hermione Lee (Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1987). The short stories dealing with the Boer War include "The Captive," pp. 36-58; "A Sahib's War," pp. 87-104; "The Comprehension of Private Copper, " pp. 144-54. Kipling's view of conscription and a military version of scouting for young boys is presenterd in a story dealing with a dream about an ambush against British troops in South Africa, "The Army of a Dream," pp. 202-41.
Rudyard Kipling, Something of Myself for my Friends Known and Unknown (London: Macmillan, 1937). Chapter 6 deals with South Africa, pp. 147-75.
Lord Baden-Powell of Gilwell, Lessons from the "Varsity of Life" (London: C. Arthur Pearson, 1933). VII "The South African War," pp. 198-214.
Kit Denton, Closed File (Sydney: Rigby, 1983).
Breaker Morant and the Bushveldt Carbineers, ed. Arthur Davey (Cape Town: Van Riebeeck Society, 1987). Second Series No. 18.
L.M. Field, The Forgotten War: Australian Involvement in the South African Conflict of 1899-1902 (Melbourne University Press, 1979).
F.M. Cutlack, Breaker Morant: A Horseman Who Made History. With a Selection of his Bush Ballads (1962) (Sydney: Ure Smith, 1980).
Hallman B. Bryant, "'Breaker' Morant in Fact, Fiction and Film," Literature/Film Quarterly, 1987, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 138-45.
Peter Coleman, Bruce Beresford: Instincts of the Heart (Sydney: Angus & Robertson, 1992).
Pat H. Broeske, "Beresford, Bruce" in The International Dictionary of Films and Filmmakers: Volume 2 Directors/Filmmakers, ed. Christopher Lyon (London: Macmillan, 1987), pp. 40-41.
Based on a play by Kenneth Ross, "Breaker" Morant (1978).
Kit Denton, The Breaker (1973) (Sydney: Angus and Robertson, 1980).
|
See the textbook reading on Imperialism for the Seminar on the Boer War and the British Empire.
Theodore S. Hamerow, The Birth of a New Europe (1983): a serious omission in Hamerow's book is the absence of chapters dealing with culture (whether "high" or popular). There are indirect references in the chapters on "6. The Spread of Learning" and "9. Civic Ideologies and Social Values".
Eric Hobsbawm: there are some excellent chapters on "high culture" (art, music, literature) and the relationship between science (and technology) and European society. When it comes to "mass" or popular culture Hobsbawm limits his discussion to political activity and nationalism. His personal taste runs to 20thC jazz, on which he has written a considerable amount.
George L. Mosse, The Image of Man: The Creation of Modern Masculinity (Oxford University Press, 1996). Mosse seeks to explain the cultural origins of 20thC Nazism by examining the emergence of aggressive, racist and militaristic notions of masculinity from the late 18thC.
Kevin McAleer, Dueling: The Cult of Honor in Fin-de-siècle Germany (Princeton University Press, 1994). Chap. III "Theirs is Not to Reason Why", pp. 85-118; Chap V. "Les Belles Dames Sans Merci", pp. 159-60, 178-81
Imperialism and Popular Culture, ed. John M. MacKenzie (Manchester Universitiy Press, 1986). Articles by:
John J. MacAloon, This Great Symbol: Pierre de Coubertin and the Origins of the Modern Olympic Games (University of Chicago Press, 1984).
Ute Schwabe, ""Pierre de Coubertin" in Historical Dictionary of the Modern Olympic Movment, ed. John E. Findling and Kimberly D. Pelle (Westport, Connecticut: Greenwood, 1996), pp. 350-57.
George L. Mosse, The Nationalization of the Masses: Political Symbolism and Mass Movements in Germany from the Napoleonic Wars through the Third Reich (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1996).
See the handout for Istvan Szabo, Colonel Redl (1984) 2hrs 29 (LD).
On sport and athleticism:
On manliness and masculinity:
On defending one's honour:
On imperialism and popular culture:
On imperialism and high culture:
On attitudes towards empire, the nation, and manliness held by the generation of men who went off to war in 1914:
You are required to hand in a Primary Source Exercise, a Film Analysis Exercise and a Major Essay. The major Essay is due at the end of the semester. The first exercise (either on a Primary Source or on a Film) is due in the mid-semester break. The second exercise (either on a Primary Source or on a Film) is due at the relevant Seminar in the second half of the semester. You must choose a different Seminar Topic for each of these pieces of written work, in other words there can be no doubling up of topics.
"Select one of the Primary Sources in the Reader of Primary Sources and answer the following questions: what kind of primary source is it, who wrote (or painted) it, when was it written, why was it written, what does the source tell us about the past?"
In your answer you should
"Select one of the feature films shown in this Subject and, by using at least one of the primary sources in the Reader of Primary Sources, assess the historical accuracy of the film and account for any discrepancies you find."
In your answer you should
Please note: The full bibliography is only available online.
Theodor Fontane, Effi Briest (1895), trans. Douglas Parmée (Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1985).
Rudyard Kipling, Kim (1901), ed. Alan Sandison (Oxford University press, 1989).
Pierre de Coubertin, The Olympic Idea : Discourses and Essays, ed. Carl-Diehm-Institut, trans. John G. Dixon (Stuttgart: Hoffmann, 1967).
Pierre de Coubertin, "Does cosmopolitan life lead to international friendliness?" American Monthly Review of Reviews, vol. 17, 1898.
Baron Pierre de Coubertin et al., The Olympic Games in 776 BC to 1896 AD and The Olympic Games of 1896 (Athens and paris, 1896). Facsimile edition 1966.
George L. Mosse, The Culture of Western Europe: The 19th and 20th Centuries (3rd edition. Boulder, Col.: Westview Press, 1988).
H. Stuart Hughes, Consciousness and Society: The Reorientation of European Social Thought 1890-1930 (Frogmore, St. Albans: Paladin, 1974).
Peter Gay, The Cultivation of Hatred (New York: Norton, 1993).
Stephen Kern, The Culture of Time and Space, 1880-1918 (Harvard University Press, 1983).
Arno J. Mayer, The Persistence of the Old Regime: Europe to the Great War (New York: Pantheon books, 1981).
James A. Mangan, The Games Ethic and Imperialism: Aspects of the Diffusion of an Ideal (Harmondsworth: Viking, 1986).
James A. Mangan, Athleticism in the Victorian and Edwardian Public School: The Emergence and Consolidation of an Educational Ideology (Cambridge University Press, 1981).
Richard A. Woeltz, "Sport, Culture, and Society in Late Imperial and Weimar Germany: Some Suggestions for Further Research," Journal of Sport History, 1977, vol. 4.
Eugen Weber, "Pierre de Coubertin and the Introduction of Organized Sport in France," Journal of Contemporary History, 1970, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 3-26.
John J. MacAloon, This Great Symbol: Pierre de Coubertin and the Origins of the Modern Olympic Games (University of Chicago Press, 1984).
Historical Dictionary of the Modern Olympic Movment, ed. John E. Findling and Kimberly D. Pelle (Westport, Connecticut: Greenwood, 1996).
Christopher R. Hill, Olympic Politics : Athens to Atlanta, 1896-1996 (1992) (2nd edition 1996).
Allen Guttmann, The Olympics: A History of the Modern Games (Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1992).
Richard D. Mandall, Sport: A Cultural History (New York: Columbia University Press, 1984).
Henning Eichberg, "Forward Race and the Laughter of Pygmies: On Olympic Sport" in Fin de Siècle and its Legacy, ed. Mikulas Teich and Roy Porter (Cambridge University Press, 1990), pp. 115-31.
Manliness and Morality: Middle Class Masculinity in Britain and America 1800-1940, ed. J.A. Mangan and James Walvin (Manchester University Press, 1987). Articles by
George L. Mosse, The Image of Man: The Creation of Modern Masculinity (Oxford University Press, 1996).
Robert A. Nye, Masculinity and Male Codes of Honour in Modern France (Oxford University Press, 1993).
Peter N. Stearns, Be A Man! Males in Modern Society (1979).
Norman Vance, The Sinews of the Spirit: The Ideal of Christian Manliness in Victorian Literature and Religious Thought (Cambridge University Press, 1985).
See the website on Duels and Dueling by Tim Spalding.
Robert A. Nye, "Fencing, the Duel and Republican Manhood in the Third Republic," Journal of Contemporary History, 1990, vol. 25 .
Kevin McAleer, Dueling: The Cult of Honor in Fin-de-siècle Germany (Princeton University Press, 1994).
Donna T. Andrews, "The Code of Honour and its Critics: The Opposition to Duelling in England, 1700-1850," Social History, 1980, vol. 5, no. 2.
Edward Berenson, "The Affaire Caillaux: Honor, Masculinity, and the Duel in France in the Belle Epoque," Proceedings of the Western Society for French History (New Orleans), 1990.
Istvan Deak, "Latter Day Knights: Officer's Honor and Duelling in the Austro-Hungarian Army," Österreichische Osthefte, 1986, vol. 28.
Mark Girouard, The Return to Camelot: Chivalry and the English Gentleman (New Haven, 1981).
B. Wyatt-Brown, Southern Honor: Ethics and Behavior in the Old South (Oxford University Press, 1982).
V.G. Kiernan, The Duel in European History: Honour and the Reign of Aristocracy (Oxford University Press, 1989).
Imperialism and Popular Culture, ed. John M. MacKenzie (Manchester Universitiy Press, 1986). Articles by:
Edward Said, Culture and Imperialism (London: Vintage, 1994). Chap. 2 "Consolidated Vision" - Section V "The Pleasure of Imperialism", pp. 159-96 on Kipling's Kim.
John M. MacKenzie, Propaganda and Empire: The Manipulation of British Public Opinion, 1886-1960 (Manchester University Press, 1984).
Robert Dixon, Writing the Colonial Adventure: Race, Gender and Nation in Anglo-Australian Popular Fiction, 1875-1914 (Cambridge University Press, 1995).
George L. Mosse, The Nationalization of the Masses: Political Symbolism and Mass Movements in Germany from the Napoleonic Wars through the Third Reich (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1996).
Peter Parker, The Old Lie: The Great War and the Public School Ethos (London, 1987).
Robert Wohl, The Generation of 1914 (Cambridge, Mass.: 1979).
Roland N. Stromberg, Redemption through War: The Intellectuals and 1914 (Lawrence: Regents Press of Kansas, 1982).
Robert Wohl, "The Generation of 1914 and Modernism," in Modernism: Challenges and Perspectives, ed. M. Chefdov et al. (University of Illinois, 1986).
Michael C.C. Adams, The Great Adventure: Male Desire and the Coming of World War One (Indiana University Press, 1990).
The Age of Kipling, ed. John Ross (New York: Simon and Schuster, 1972). Eric Stokes, "Kipling's Imperialism," pp. 90-98.
Kipling's Mind and Art: Selected Critical Essays, ed. Andrew Rutherford (Stanford University Press, 1966).
Henry Garland, The Berlin Novels of Theodor Fontane (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1980).
Alan Bance, Theodor Fontane: The Major Novels (Cambridge, 1982).
Joachim Remak, The Gentle Critic: Theodor Fontane and German Politics 1848-1898 (Syracuse, New York: Syracuse University Press, 1964).
George L. Mosse, Toward the Final Solution. A History of European Racism, London: Dent, 1978, pp. xi - xvi, 113-127.
John Springall, Youth, Empire and Society: British Youth Movements, 1883-1940 (London, 1980).
Allen Warren, "Sir Robert Baden-Powell, the Scout Movement and Citizen Training in Great Britain, 1900-1920," English Historical Review, 1986.
Michael Rosenthal, The Character Factory: Baden-Powell and the Origin of the Boy Scout Movement (London, 1986).
[See the Lecture Notes for this topic.]
Eric Hobsbawm, On History (London: Abacus, 1998).
Theodore S. Hamerow, Reflections on History and Historians (Madison, Wisconsin, 1987). Chap. VI "What Is the Use of History?", pp. 205-43.
David M. Hart, "The Relevance of the Humanities" (1989)
Consider the following for discussion:
Everyone should write and bring to their Seminar a 500 word Seminar Exercise on the following topic:
Please note: The full bibliography is only available online.
Howard Zinn, The Politics of History (2nd edition. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1990). Chap. 3 "What is Radical History?", pp. 35-55.
David Lowenthal, The Past is a Foreign Country (Cambridge University Press, 1985).
The Vital Past: Writing on the Uses of History, ed. Stephen Vaughn (Athens, Georgia: University of Georgia Press, 1985).
Bernard Bailyn
G.P. Gooch, History and Historians in the Nineteenth Century (Boston: Beacon Press, 1968).
G.R. Elton, The Practice of History (London: Methuen, 1967).
W.K. Hancock, Attempting History (Canberra: ANU, 1969).
Marc Bloch, The Historian's Craft, trans. Peter Putnam (New York: Vintage, 1964).
J.H. Hexter, The History Primer (New York: Basic, 1971).
Herbert Butterfield, The Whig Interpretation of History (1931) (Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1973).
Essays in Modern European Historiography, ed. S. William Halperin (University of Chicago Press, 1970).
E.H. Carr, What is History? (1961) (Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1974).
The Varieties of History: From Voltaire to the Present, ed. Fritz Stern (London: Macmillan, 1970).
Pieter Geyl, Encounters in History (London: Fontana, 1967).
Pieter Geyl, Debates with Historians (London: Fontana, 1962).
E.P. Thompson, The Povery of Theory and Other Essays (1978).
François Furet, In the Workshop of History (Chicago, 1984).
Fernand Braudel, On History (London, 1980).
Traian Stoianovich, French Historical Method: The Annales Paradigm (Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press, 1976).
George Iggers, New Directions in European Historiagraphy (revised 1985 edition).
The Harvard Guide to American History, ed. Oscar Handlin, et al. Part One.
Peter Gay, Style in History (New York, 1974).
Marc Ferro, The Use and Abuse of History: Or How the Past is Taught (London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1984).
David H. Fischer, Historians' Fallacies: Toward a Logic of Historical Thought (New York: Harper & Row, 1970).
Gertrude Himmelfarb, The New History and the Old (Cambridge, Mass: Belhnap Press of Harvard University Press, 1987).